Report: President Trump’s DHS Requests 20,000 National Guard Troops to Assist with Immigration

| Published May 15, 2025

In a significant escalation of immigration enforcement efforts, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) under President Donald Trump has formally requested the deployment of approximately 20,000 National Guard troops to assist with immigration operations across the United States.

Key Points:

Historic Deployment: If approved, this would mark the first time National Guard troops are directly involved in enforcing immigration laws within the U.S. interior.
Unspecified Roles: The specific duties of the National Guard troops have not been detailed. Historically, their roles have included logistical support, surveillance, and infrastructure assistance, rather than direct law enforcement actions.
Part of Broader Strategy: This request aligns with President Trump’s broader strategy to enhance immigration enforcement, which includes increasing DHS personnel by 20,000 officers and reallocating agents from other federal agencies such as the ATF, DEA, and U.S. Marshals Service.
Legal Considerations: The deployment raises legal questions, particularly concerning the Posse Comitatus Act, which restricts the use of federal military personnel in domestic law enforcement. However, National Guard troops, when under state authority, are not bound by this act, potentially allowing for their involvement in immigration enforcement activities.

WATCH — “Illegal Immigration Is Not a Victimless Crime”: Homan Details the Horrors He’s Seen of Open Borders:

Implications of Deploying 20,000 National Guard Troops for Immigration Enforcement (Conservative Perspective)

1. Enhanced Border Security and Immigration Control

Increased Enforcement Capability: The deployment of 20,000 National Guard troops would significantly boost DHS’s ability to conduct immigration operations, increasing arrests, detentions, and deportations.
Deterrent Effect: The presence of troops may serve as a strong deterrent to illegal border crossings, reinforcing the message that the U.S. is serious about enforcing immigration laws.

2. Legal and Constitutional Questions

Posse Comitatus Act Considerations: While the Posse Comitatus Act restricts the use of federal military for domestic law enforcement, the National Guard can operate under state control without violating this law, providing legal flexibility.
State Cooperation: Some states may resist deploying their National Guard troops for immigration purposes, leading to potential legal battles between the federal government and state administrations.

3. Strengthened Federal Authority in Immigration Policy

Expanded Executive Power: The deployment underscores President Trump’s commitment to using federal resources to secure the border, reinforcing the executive branch’s authority over immigration.
Precedent for Future Administrations: This action may establish a precedent for future presidents to deploy military forces for domestic law enforcement, particularly in response to immigration crises.

4. Potential Pushback from Civil Liberties Groups

Criticism from Advocacy Organizations: Civil rights groups may argue that using military forces in immigration enforcement is excessive, raising concerns about the militarization of domestic law enforcement.
Legal Challenges: Lawsuits could be filed challenging the legality of the deployment, particularly if any troop activities are seen as violating constitutional rights.

5. Political Fallout and Public Opinion

Support Among Conservatives: The move is likely to be praised by conservatives who see it as a strong stance on border security and national sovereignty.
Backlash from Progressives: Progressive lawmakers and advocacy groups may denounce the move as inhumane and authoritarian, framing it as an attack on immigrant communities.

6. Impact on State-Federal Relations

State Resistance: Democratic-led states may refuse to allow their National Guard troops to participate, creating a conflict between state governors and the federal administration.
Potential Federalization of Troops: If states refuse to cooperate, the federal government may attempt to federalize National Guard units, further escalating tensions.

7. Practical and Logistical Challenges

Coordination Complexity: Managing 20,000 troops across multiple states for immigration enforcement would require extensive coordination between DHS, state governments, and the Department of Defense.
Troop Readiness and Morale: Guardsmen, who typically serve part-time and are trained for disaster response and defense, may face challenges adapting to law enforcement roles, impacting morale.

Overall Takeaway:

President Trump’s request to deploy 20,000 National Guard troops for immigration enforcement marks a bold and unprecedented step to strengthen border security and uphold the rule of law. From a conservative standpoint, it demonstrates necessary resolve to protect national sovereignty and deter illegal immigration. However, it also raises complex legal, logistical, and political challenges, especially regarding state cooperation and civil liberties concerns. Ultimately, this move signals a tough, no-nonsense approach to immigration that prioritizes enforcement and national security.