Urgent Warning: MRNA Vaccines May Be Linked to Rising Cancer Rates

Published September 5, 2025

Nicolas Hulscher, writing in Dr. Peter McCullough’s Substack, is covering a new comprehensive review of over 100 studies that shows the shocking impact mRNA injections may be having on rates of cancer:

A comprehensive literature review by Mathilde Debord titled “COVID-19 mRNA vaccines can induce cancer in 17 distinct ways, according to over 100 studies” was just published in Le Point Critique. Drawing from over 100 peer-reviewed studies, it outlines 17 distinct biological mechanisms by which the injections may initiate, accelerate, or reactivate malignant processes.

A recent article claiming that mRNA vaccines may be linked to rising cancer rates presents a controversial perspective on potential health risks associated with these vaccines, particularly in relation to cancer. It references a literature review suggesting that mRNA vaccines could theoretically induce cancer through multiple biological mechanisms, including genome instability, immune system dysregulation, chronic inflammation, and interference with DNA repair processes.

However, these claims should be approached with caution. The scientific consensus, based on numerous peer-reviewed studies, does not support the idea that mRNA vaccines cause or increase cancer risk. Some observational studies noted minor fluctuations in cancer mortality in recent years, but no causal link to mRNA vaccination has been established. Health authorities consistently affirm that COVID-19 vaccines do not cause cancer, contribute to recurrence, or accelerate disease progression.

In fact, mRNA technology has shown significant promise in cancer treatment. Research indicates that mRNA vaccines can stimulate the immune system to recognize and attack cancer cells, and ongoing clinical trials are exploring their potential to treat various cancers.

The claims in the controversial article reflect a broader narrative that has been challenged by the scientific community. Leading researchers involved in the development of mRNA technology have expressed concern that actions limiting mRNA research could hinder scientific progress and reduce public health preparedness.

👥 Public/Political Reactions

🧬 Public Response: Misinformation and ‘Turbo Cancer’ Claims

The term “Turbo Cancer” has emerged in anti-vaccine circles, suggesting that mRNA vaccines cause rapid, aggressive cancers. However, experts have debunked this notion, explaining that it lacks biological and scientific basis. For instance, a review article clarifies that the conclusions drawn from animal studies on mRNA cancer vaccines are often misinterpreted and do not support claims of cancer acceleration in humans.

Despite these clarifications, misinformation persists, with some individuals attributing pre-pandemic cancer rates to COVID-19 vaccines. This misattribution is misleading, as cancer statistics from organizations like the American Cancer Society predate the availability of these vaccines.

🏛️ Political Reactions: Bipartisan Criticism of RFK Jr.’s Policies

U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has faced bipartisan criticism for his recent actions and statements regarding mRNA vaccines. During a Senate hearing, Kennedy was questioned about his decision to remove all 17 members of the CDC’s vaccine advisory panel and cancel significant vaccine contracts. Senators from both parties expressed concerns that these moves could undermine public trust in vaccines and public health institutions.

Critics argue that Kennedy’s stance aligns with anti-science rhetoric and could have detrimental effects on public health. The Guardian published an opinion piece labeling his agenda as “anti-science” and warning of potential catastrophic consequences for the United States.

🧪 Scientific Consensus: No Evidence Linking mRNA Vaccines to Cancer

The broader scientific community maintains that there is no credible evidence linking mRNA vaccines to cancer. A comprehensive review by FactCheck.org emphasizes that claims associating COVID-19 mRNA vaccines with cancer development are unfounded and based on misinterpretations of scientific data.

Moreover, mRNA technology holds promise for cancer treatment. Research indicates that mRNA vaccines can stimulate the immune system to recognize and combat cancer cells, with ongoing clinical trials exploring their efficacy in treating various cancers.

 Resulting Effects

🏛️ Political Mobilization

• Some right-leaning politicians and commentators have cited the article to advocate for reducing federal oversight of vaccines, calling for more personal choice in healthcare decisions.

• Figures aligned with RFK Jr. and similar movements have leveraged the article to question the credibility of agencies like the CDC and FDA, framing them as politically compromised.

💬 Public Perception Among Conservative Audiences

• Polling and social sentiment indicate that these articles reinforce fears about long-term vaccine risks among right-leaning Americans, increasing distrust of mRNA technology specifically.

• There’s a tendency to interpret ambiguous data or preliminary studies as “proof” of harm, fueling grassroots campaigns to halt or delay vaccine programs.

📰 Media Ecosystem Effects

• Right-leaning blogs, podcasts, and newsletters echo and expand on Breitbart’s claims, creating an information cascade that amplifies vaccine skepticism.

• Even when mainstream science refutes these claims, counter-narratives persist in these networks, reinforcing ideological divides.

🔮 Future Outlook

🔮 Scientific and Medical Outlook

• No change in consensus expected: Peer-reviewed studies and regulatory bodies (CDC, FDA, WHO) continue to find no causal link between mRNA vaccines and cancer.

• Ongoing research: mRNA technology will continue to be investigated for both infectious diseases and cancer therapies, with potential breakthroughs in cancer immunotherapy potentially reshaping public perception.

• Monitoring for safety: Long-term post-vaccine surveillance is ongoing, but it is unlikely to validate claims of widespread cancer risk.

📡 Media and Public Narrative Outlook

• Right-leaning media amplification: The narrative may persist or even grow in influence among right-leaning audiences, particularly through social media, newsletters, and podcasts that favor vaccine skepticism.

• Misinformation resilience: Even if debunked by mainstream science, stories like this often persist due to confirmation bias and ideological framing.

• Polarization effects: Public trust in public health institutions may remain lower among audiences exposed to repeated narratives questioning vaccine safety.

🏛️ Political Outlook

• Policy influence: Politicians aligned with vaccine skepticism may continue to push for less regulation and more “personal choice” messaging, using articles like this as rhetorical support.

• Potential legislative pressure: Some states could see increased advocacy for reduced vaccine mandates or expanded exemptions, especially in areas with strong right-leaning constituencies.

🌐 Long-term Implications

• Health literacy challenges: Persistent misinformation may complicate efforts to implement future vaccination campaigns, both for COVID-19 boosters and other mRNA-based vaccines.

• Public-private trust gap: A widening gap between scientific consensus and public perception could make future public health interventions more contentious.

• Scientific opportunity: Success in mRNA cancer vaccines could counter misinformation if real-world breakthroughs are widely reported and explained effectively.

 Bottom Line:

The article claiming a link between mRNA vaccines and rising cancer rates has sparked controversy, particularly among right-leaning audiences. While it has amplified vaccine skepticism and fueled political debate, the broader scientific community continues to find no credible evidence supporting these claims.

The public and political reactions—ranging from the spread of misinformation to legislative and advocacy efforts—highlight how narratives questioning vaccine safety can gain traction even without scientific backing. Right-leaning media and commentators have amplified these claims, framing them within a broader distrust of government agencies and pharmaceutical companies.

Looking ahead, the scientific and medical outlook remains positive, with mRNA technology continuing to show promise for both infectious diseases and cancer treatment. However, the persistence of these narratives underscores the ongoing challenge of bridging the gap between scientific consensus and public perception, particularly in politically polarized environments.

Ultimately, the situation illustrates the importance of critical evaluation of sources, reliance on peer-reviewed research, and clear science communication to mitigate the spread of misinformation while advancing public health.

SOURCES: BREITBART – Urgent Warning: MRNA Vaccines May Be Linked to Rising Cancer Rates

REUTERS – US senators pit Kennedy against Trump on vaccine policy