| Published May 9, 2025
The recent unveiling of the 12-foot bronze statue titled Grounded in the Stars by British artist Thomas J. Price in New York City’s Times Square has ignited significant debate, particularly among conservative commentators. The statue portrays an anonymous, full-figured Black woman in casual attire, and its placement in such a prominent location has been interpreted by some as a reflection of shifting cultural values.
Perspectives on the Statue
In his article, Ben Shapiro criticizes the statue as emblematic of what he perceives as the Left’s tendency to promote “ridiculous policies and imagery” that alienate mainstream Americans. He argues that honoring an anonymous figure who hasn’t achieved notable accomplishments diminishes traditional standards of heroism and excellence. Shapiro contrasts this statue with nearby monuments of historical figures like Father Francis Duffy and George M. Cohan, suggesting that the new installation lacks the aspirational qualities these traditional statues embody.
Similarly, Brandon Morse of RedState interprets the statue as a deliberate assertion of ideological dominance. He contends that the statue serves not merely as a celebration of diversity but as a “conqueror’s flag,” symbolizing the Left’s prioritization of identity politics over historical legacy. Morse points to the removal of a Thomas Jefferson statue from City Hall as indicative of a broader trend to replace monuments of foundational figures with representations aligned with contemporary progressive values.
Artist’s Intent and Broader Cultural Implications
Thomas J. Price has stated that Grounded in the Stars aims to “instigate meaningful connections and bind intimate emotional states that allow for deeper reflection around the human condition and greater cultural diversity.” The statue is part of his broader Man Series, which seeks to challenge traditional notions of public monuments by representing everyday individuals rather than celebrated historical figures.
The divergent reactions to the statue underscore ongoing debates about public art, representation, and the evolving criteria for whom society chooses to honor. While some view the statue as a progressive step toward inclusivity and recognition of diverse identities, others perceive it as a departure from celebrating achievement and historical significance.
Pros and Cons of the 12-Foot Statue “Grounded in the Stars” in Times Square
Pros:
-
Encourages Public Debate: The statue has sparked significant conversation, allowing conservatives to voice concerns about cultural shifts and the erosion of traditional values.
-
Highlights Cultural Priorities: Its placement among historically significant figures like Father Francis Duffy and George M. Cohan provides a clear contrast, helping to showcase the difference between traditional heroism and modern identity-focused art.
-
Exposes Political Motivations: For conservatives, the statue is a clear example of how progressive values prioritize identity politics over merit and historical achievement.
Cons:
-
Undermines Heroic Standards: Unlike traditional statues that celebrate individuals with notable accomplishments, this statue represents an anonymous figure, which conservatives see as a downgrade from honoring achievement.
-
Promotes Identity Politics: Critics argue that the focus on the figure’s race, size, and gender is a reflection of progressive ideology rather than genuine artistic merit or historical significance.
-
Disrespects Historical Legacy: Its placement in Times Square, near statues of historical American figures, is viewed as an attempt to overshadow or replace traditional symbols of American heritage.
-
Alienates Mainstream Americans: As Ben Shapiro suggests, public installations like this risk creating cultural divides rather than uniting the public under shared values.
Conclusion:
The 12-foot statue Grounded in the Stars in Times Square stands as a powerful symbol of the ongoing cultural debate over public art and representation. Supporters celebrate it as a step toward greater diversity and inclusivity, while critics view it as a politicized rejection of traditional values of heroism and historical significance. Ultimately, the statue serves as a mirror, reflecting the conflicting values within society—challenging viewers to consider what they believe is worth honoring in public spaces.
SOURCES: DAILY WIRE – Why The Left Keeps Losing: A 12-Foot Warning In Times Square
REDSTATE – The Fat Woman Statue in NYC Is a Far More Aggressive Thing Than They’re Telling You
Be the first to comment