ALWAYS ON THE WRONG SIDE: Democrats Are Now Trying to Cancel the Blue Angels

| Published July 26, 2025

Seattle Backlash: Blue Angels Face Legal Heat, Billboard Protests, and Media Censorship Claims

The U.S. Navy’s iconic flight demonstration squadron, the Blue Angels, is now under fire—not from foreign adversaries, but from activists and lawsuits within American borders. A growing chorus of opposition in Seattle is casting a shadow over their long-standing role in the city’s summer Seafair celebration, sparking debates over patriotism, free speech, and the future of military traditions.

From Sky Celebrations to Legal Turbulence

A Seattle woman has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Navy, alleging that the Blue Angels’ annual flyovers constitute “acoustic torture” for her and her cat. The lawsuit also claims that her social media posts criticizing the airshows were censored, raising concerns about government overreach and suppression of dissenting views. Her case includes First Amendment arguments, implying that public discourse about military displays is being unfairly limited.

🚀 Allegations in the Complaint

1. Cat-terrorizing Flyovers
   Lombardi claims that the Blue Angels’ August flyovers in 2023 and 2024 over Seattle produced intense noise (“sonic assault” or “auditory carpet bombing”) that caused panic attacks in her cat, Layla, who suffered from congestive heart disease. The stress allegedly worsened Layla’s condition, leading to her euthanasia on August 11, 2024

2. Suppression of Free Speech
   Lombardi had posted critical and profanity-laced comments on the Blue Angels’ Instagram page and shared a petition titled “We All Want to Feel Safe: No More Blue Angels Over Seattle.” She claims she was blocked from access on in or around August 5, 2024, which she argues violates her First Amendment rights as the Blue Angels operate under U.S. Navy policy.

Lombardi said she treated Layla like her own “daughter.”U.S. District Court Western District Of Washington At Seattle

Billboard Battle: Protesters Take It Public

Adding to the controversy, protest organizers have launched a public billboard campaign. One prominent sign urges an end to what they call a “war machine,” demanding the cancellation of the Blue Angels’ participation in local festivals. The activists argue that military flyovers are an aggressive display, particularly in a time of global instability, and should not be glorified in civilian events.

The billboard itself has sparked local debate. Critics of the protest argue that the Blue Angels represent national excellence, sacrifice, and precision, and that their shows serve to inspire younger generations while boosting civic pride and tourism.

Political Fallout: Accusations of Cancellation Attempts

The dispute has expanded into a broader political conversation. Critics of the protest movement argue that efforts to silence or cancel the Blue Angels are part of a larger trend to undermine military traditions and national pride. Some have accused progressive groups and aligned political leaders of seeking to erase symbols of American strength under the guise of sensitivity or modern values.

Others counter that raising concerns about noise pollution, militarization of public spaces, and free speech are legitimate issues in a democracy, even if those concerns challenge long-held cultural symbols.

Climate Alarmism Takes to the Skies

The pushback from the so-called Air Show Climate Action Coalition reveals yet another front in the ongoing climate crusade—this time targeting patriotic air displays in the name of environmental purity. While these activists claim they “don’t oppose Seafair,” their real grievance isn’t just with planes in the sky—it’s with anything that challenges their rigid, fear-driven climate narrative.

Groups like 350 Seattle have long made it clear that their ultimate goal isn’t moderation—it’s total decarbonization, regardless of the cost to culture, economy, or national morale. Now, they’ve set their sights on the Blue Angels, hoping to ground a tradition that has inspired generations, all because of fleeting emissions from a short annual airshow.

But let’s be honest: the carbon output of one airshow is minuscule compared to the global emissions from industrial giants like China, which continue to burn coal at record levels while facing little to no criticism from these same activist groups. It’s not about climate impact—it’s about symbolism. They see military jets, and instead of being proud, they see a chance to virtue signal.

Targeting the Blue Angels does nothing to “save the planet.” It only divides Americans further and distracts from real energy debates that deserve honest, science-based discussion—not knee-jerk alarmism and activism masquerading as environmental concern.

Implications of the Attack on the Blue Angels

1. Weakening of National Identity and Tradition

• The Blue Angels represent more than airshows—they symbolize excellence, patriotism, and military precision.

• Targeting them is part of a broader attempt to erase national traditions, particularly those that reflect American strength or military values.

• If these attacks succeed, it sets a precedent for dismantling other symbols of pride, such as Fourth of July parades, military flyovers at sporting events, and veterans’ tributes.

2. Rise of Weaponized Climate Activism

• The protests from groups like the Air Show Climate Action Coalition show how climate activism is no longer just about science—it’s about ideology.

• These activists aren’t going after China or India’s emissions—they’re going after U.S. military demonstrations and Boeing-sponsored events.

• It reflects selective outrage, where environmental concern is used to shame American institutions, not global polluters.

3. Dangerous Legal Precedents

• A lawsuit claiming “acoustic torture” from a military airshow is not just frivolous—it’s potentially dangerous.

• If the courts entertain these claims, it could open the door for more legal challenges aimed at silencing patriotic displays and military visibility.

• Weaponizing the legal system to attack tradition erodes public respect for both the judiciary and the military.

4. Chilling Effect on Military Recruitment

• Public campaigns portraying the military as harmful or controversial discourage young Americans from serving, especially in already declining recruitment environments.

• It sends the message that serving your country is something to be protested, not honored.

5. Emboldening of Cancel Culture

• These attacks are part of a wider trend where a loud minority uses social pressure, legal action, and climate narratives to control what the rest of society can celebrate.

• Today it’s airshows. Tomorrow it’s fireworks, monuments, or even the anthem. The cultural erosion doesn’t stop unless people push back.

6. Misplaced Priorities in Leadership and Media

• The fact that this movement is gaining traction in city halls and media outlets shows that many leaders are more interested in appeasing fringe activists than honoring national traditions.

• Instead of defending institutions that unite Americans, they enable the voices that tear them down.

Overall Takeaway:

What should be a moment of national pride—a stunning air display honoring the skill, courage, and discipline of America’s finest—is now under coordinated attack. The Blue Angels are being targeted not only by climate alarmists but also through a lawsuit claiming “acoustic torture” on behalf of a Seattle woman and her cat. Yes, her cat.

This isn’t about concern for the environment or personal well-being. It’s part of a growing trend: using fringe grievances and ideological outrage to dismantle anything that represents American strength. Whether it’s through courtrooms or billboards, activists are doing everything they can to erase military tradition from public life.

Groups like the Air Show Climate Action Coalition complain about carbon emissions from a once-a-year airshow—while saying nothing about the world’s largest polluters overseas. Their real goal isn’t “climate justice.” It’s to ground the symbols that still unite Americans around shared values like patriotism, service, and sacrifice.

Meanwhile, the lawsuit speaks volumes about how far we’ve drifted: from celebrating the roar of freedom overhead to filing complaints about pets being startled. These attacks, though dressed up in legal or environmental rhetoric, are really part of a deeper effort to weaken our national identity.

The Blue Angels don’t just fly—they represent excellence, readiness, and the freedom that only a strong defense can guarantee. If we allow emotional activism and activist judges to take that away, we’re not just losing an airshow—we’re surrendering the sky, the flag, and everything they stand for.

SOURCES: THE GATEWAY PUNDIT – ALWAYS ON THE WRONG SIDE: Democrats Are Now Trying to Cancel the Blue Angels

FOX 13 SEATTLE – Billboard goes up protesting Blue Angels in Seattle’s Seafair Air Show

FOX NEWS – Seattle woman takes Navy’s Blue Angels to court over social media censorship and ‘acoustic torture’ of cat

THE NEW YORK POST – Cat mom accuses Blue Angels of terrorizing her dying 14-year-old cat with ‘sonic barrage’ practices: ‘It terrified her so much’