PM: Qatar ‘playing both sides’; Doha: He’s trying to justify crimes against civilians

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (L) speaks during a ceremony at the eve of Memorial Day at the Yad LaBanim Memorial in Jerusalem, on April 29, 2025. Qatari Foreign Ministry spokesperson Majed al-Ansari speaks on a panel at the Doha Forum in the Doha Sheraton Hotel in Doha, Qatar, on December 11, 2023. (Abir SULTAN / POOL / AFP; Noushad Thekkayil/Nur Photo via Reuters)
| Published May 4, 2024

Barbs come days after Qatar accused Israel of genocide during ICJ hearing; Doha spokesperson says Netanyahu’s portrayal of Gaza op as ‘defense of civilization’ echoes dark regimes

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused Qatar of “playing both sides” in the ongoing Gaza conflict, urging Doha to choose between supporting “civilization” or aligning with Hamas. This statement intensified tensions between the two nations, especially given Qatar’s role as a key mediator in hostage negotiations between Israel and Hamas.

Qatar’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Majed Al-Ansari, swiftly rejected Netanyahu’s remarks as “inflammatory” and lacking political and moral responsibility. He criticized the Israeli portrayal of the Gaza conflict as a defense of civilization, comparing it to historical regimes that used false narratives to justify crimes against civilians. Al-Ansari emphasized the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, highlighting issues like starvation, lack of medical aid, and the use of humanitarian assistance as political leverage.

Despite mediation efforts by Qatar and Egypt, ceasefire negotiations have stalled. Israel demands the return of 59 hostages, the disarmament of Hamas, and its exclusion from future governance in Gaza. Conversely, Hamas insists on a complete end to hostilities and the withdrawal of Israeli forces before releasing any hostages.

Qatar has historically positioned itself as a mediator in Middle Eastern conflicts, leveraging its diplomatic channels and financial resources to facilitate negotiations. In the current crisis, Qatar has provided substantial humanitarian aid to Gaza and played a pivotal role in previous hostage release agreements.

The Israeli government’s recent approval of expanded military operations in Gaza further complicates the situation, signaling a potential escalation in the conflict. This development underscores the challenges facing mediators like Qatar in navigating the complex dynamics of the region.


The recent exchange between Israel and Qatar over the Gaza negotiations has several significant geopolitical, diplomatic, and humanitarian implications:

🔴 1. Breakdown of Mediation Efforts

  • Qatar’s role as mediator is at risk. Israel’s public criticism may undermine Doha’s credibility in the eyes of both sides.

  • Hamas may become less willing to negotiate if Qatar appears to bend toward Israeli demands.

  • This could delay or derail hostage release deals and ceasefire negotiations.


🟡 2. Strained Israel-Qatar Relations

  • Diplomatic ties, already limited, may further deteriorate.

  • This tension could spill over into broader regional alliances, especially among Gulf states trying to balance relationships with both Western and Palestinian actors.


🔵 3. Regional Polarization

  • Israel’s “civilization vs. barbarism” framing is likely to be perceived by Arab and Muslim nations as inflammatory.

  • Qatar, often aligned with Turkish and Iranian interests in the region, may lean more strongly away from Western-aligned positions.

  • This could deepen the Middle East’s ideological divide over the Gaza conflict.


4. Humanitarian Consequences

  • Qatar is one of Gaza’s biggest donors. If its role is undermined or if it withdraws aid, Gazans may face worsening humanitarian conditions—especially as Israel continues military operations.

  • Accusations that Israel is using aid as leverage may further politicize humanitarian access.


5. U.S. and International Mediation Impact

  • The U.S., which has worked closely with Qatar on hostage talks, may be forced to intervene more directly or mediate between Israel and Qatar themselves.

  • Other mediators like Egypt could gain more influence if Qatar’s position weakens.


Overall Takeaway

The clash between Israel and Qatar highlights the fragility of current Gaza ceasefire negotiations and signals a deeper breakdown in trust between key regional players. By accusing Qatar of “playing both sides,” Israel risks alienating one of the few states with direct influence over Hamas and a proven track record in mediation. This dispute could derail hostage talks, worsen the humanitarian crisis, and deepen regional polarization — ultimately making a peaceful resolution to the Gaza conflict even harder to achieve.


SOURCES: THE TIMES OF ISRAEL – PM: Qatar ‘playing both sides’; Doha: He’s trying to justify crimes against civilians
REUTERS – Israel calls on Qatar to ‘stop playing both sides’ in Gaza talks
GMA NEWS ONLINE – Israel calls on Qatar to ‘stop playing both sides’ in Gaza talks

 

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply