Who’s Funding This? Hundreds Show Up Out of Nowhere, Interesting Item Handed Out to LA Anti-ICE Group

June 10, 2025 Diana Zapata News, Politics 1
| Published June 10, 2025

Los Angeles has seen a dramatic surge in organized protests and civil unrest in recent weeks. Demonstrations involving both U.S. citizens and migrant groups have intensified across parts of the city, often capturing public attention not only for their scale, but for the coordinated resources backing them. As tensions rise, questions emerge—not just about the reasons for protest, but about the quiet networks sustaining them from behind the scenes.

In downtown LA, demonstrators have taken to the streets with professional signage, bottled water, printed guides, and in some cases, even pre-packaged protest kits. One journalist covering the events noticed a curious detail: the widespread distribution of branded materials and resources—items not typically available to spontaneous grassroots movements. This prompted further inspection of who or what might be supporting these actions on a logistical level.

Some of the materials observed, including “know your rights” pamphlets and legal hotline cards, trace back to advocacy organizations with existing political ties. Publicly available records show that at least one of the key groups involved has received substantial federal and state-level funding. One such group, Pueblo Sin Fronteras, has previously been cited in immigration policy debates. According to reports, they were active in organizing transportation and shelter for protest participants.

Meanwhile, additional documentation connects another advocacy outfit to foreign-linked influence. A separate organization reportedly tied to a Chinese community group—with historic affiliation to Chinese Communist Party-aligned networks—has surfaced in connection with educational outreach and mobilization efforts around the LA demonstrations. Though its direct role in protest logistics remains less clear, its presence raises broader interest in who’s participating behind the scenes and why.

Eyewitness accounts, including statements from journalists embedded in the crowd, describe protest environments that seem unusually well-prepared. Beyond the typical chants and signage, there were structured call-and-response scripts, protester instructions handed out in multiple languages, and teams designated to help with crowd coordination. These observations point to a level of infrastructure uncommon in organic protest movements.

Funding disclosures and IRS filings linked to some involved nonprofits reveal a combination of taxpayer-backed grants and private contributions. In certain cases, records suggest strong ties to Democratic Party-aligned political circles, especially in California. The organized nature of these protests has prompted renewed discussion around public accountability, especially in how civic engagement intersects with government-supported funding channels.

At the street level, many participants remain unaware of the deeper affiliations of the groups supplying their materials. For most, the mission remains personal—an expression of frustration, hope, or demand for visibility. Yet as new information continues to surface, the landscape surrounding these LA protests becomes increasingly layered, offering a portrait of protest that goes far beyond the signs held aloft in the city’s streets.

Then they reported that people were being given earplugs, gas masks, and water bottles, not to drink but to toss at the cops.

Melugin also said people were communicating by radio to let others know where the police movements were.

 

But this was perhaps the most intriguing moment, from the local Fox affiliate: the video of the truck pulling up, just giving away bionic face shields.

 

 

Fox LA’s Elex Michaelson also commented, asking who was funding this.

 

Here are the implications that can be drawn from the information in the articles and the expanded feature:

  1. Use of Public Funds Raises Scrutiny
    The involvement of taxpayer-funded groups in organizing or supporting protests may prompt concerns over how public resources are allocated, especially when those activities contribute to civil unrest or political advocacy.

  2. Political Alignment of NGOs May Influence Protest Objectives
    Some of the nonprofits involved have ties to Democratic political circles. This suggests that protests may not be entirely grassroots, but rather coordinated in part through ideologically aligned infrastructure, raising questions about authenticity and motive.

  3. Foreign Influence Concerns
    The reported link to a China-affiliated organization introduces the risk of foreign influence in domestic civic activity. Even if indirect, such associations could be seen as attempts to shape public discourse or exploit internal U.S. divisions.

  4. Accountability and Transparency Issues
    The presence of well-funded, highly organized protest efforts calls for increased transparency from nonprofit organizations, especially those benefiting from public funds or operating in politically sensitive contexts.

  5. Perception of Protest Legitimacy May Be Undermined
    If protests are viewed as orchestrated rather than spontaneous, public trust in the sincerity of demonstrators’ motives could erode, weakening support for the underlying issues they aim to highlight.

Overall Takeaway:

The sudden scale and coordination of the LA anti-ICE protests, along with the distribution of professionally prepared materials, point to the involvement of well-resourced organizations operating behind the scenes. Evidence from multiple reports indicates that at least two groups—one receiving taxpayer funding and another with ties to a Chinese-linked network—have played roles in supporting the demonstrations. While many participants may be acting out of personal conviction, the infrastructure enabling their actions suggests that these protests are not purely spontaneous. This raises urgent questions about who is truly shaping public demonstrations, how they are funded, and whether the line between civic activism and political orchestration is becoming increasingly blurred.

SOURCES: REDSTATE – Who’s Funding This? Hundreds Show Up Out of Nowhere, Interesting Item Handed Out to LA Anti-ICE Group
THE NEW YORK POST – Some LA migrant protests fueled by taxpayer-funded group with Dem ties — another with CCP link

 

Related Articles

1 Comment

  1. Everything by or from the left is FAKE!!!

    Nothing on the left is real, or organic, it’s all organized by the criminal left (including support from the transnational criminal organization, the CCP)!

Leave a Reply