President Trump, There are Legal Grounds to Revoke the Citizenship of Zohran Mamdani. Don’t Just Defeat Mamdani, DEPORT HIM!

screen-shot-2025-06-29-at-11.26.46-am_16x9-1200x630 (1)

| Published July 1, 2025

The name Zohran Mamdani has ignited fierce debate across the American political landscape. A naturalized U.S. citizen, New York lawmaker, and outspoken advocate for immigrant rights, Mamdani now finds himself at the center of a growing controversy—one that pits constitutional protections against political agendas. Calls from some Republican figures to strip his citizenship and deport him have drawn national attention, especially after resurfaced lyrics from his past were used to question his loyalty to the country.

At the heart of the matter lies a chilling question: Can a citizen’s past words, beliefs, or identity become grounds for revoking their American status? And what happens when those targeting you sit at the highest levels of power?

🧭 Who is Zohran Mamdani?

Born in Uganda to an Indian-Ugandan father and Indian-American mother, moved to NYC at age 7.
Naturalized in 2018, elected to NY State Assembly shortly after
A Democratic Socialist and Muslim — would be NYC’s first Muslim mayor if elected.

🔥 What Sparked Deportation Calls?

The push to deport New York State Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani erupted from a mix of political tension, ideological division, and resurfaced controversy—all amplified in the lead-up to the 2026 election cycle.

🎤 1. Old Rap Lyrics Resurface

The immediate spark came from a resurfaced 2017 video in which Mamdani, formerly an artist and activist, recited a rap verse defending the “Holy Land Five”—a group of Muslim-American charity leaders convicted of illegally funneling money to Hamas.

In the verse, Mamdani criticized U.S. foreign policy and called attention to what he described as the unjust imprisonment of the five men.
Critics argue the verse reveals support for extremists and questions Mamdani’s allegiance.
Supporters counter that the verse was political expression protected under the First Amendment and part of broader advocacy for Palestinian rights.

🧾 2. Accusations of Citizenship Fraud

Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN) led the charge, alleging that Mamdani’s 2018 naturalization could be invalid if he failed to disclose his affiliations or beliefs.

Ogles called on the Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security to investigate whether Mamdani committed naturalization fraud.
However, no credible evidence has been presented to show Mamdani withheld material information during his citizenship process.

🛂 3. Mamdani’s Anti-ICE, Pro-Sanctuary Stance

Mamdani’s recent pledge to block ICE operations in New York City if elected mayor provoked outrage from Trump allies.

Former ICE Director Tom Homan called Mamdani “a national security threat in a suit.”
Trump himself said Mamdani is “bad for New York,” warning he would have “a lot of fun” dealing with him as president.

🔥 4. Islamophobia and Identity Politics

Underlying the legal accusations is a clear pattern of religious and racial targeting:

Mamdani, a practicing Muslim and son of Indian-Ugandan immigrants, has become a lightning rod for GOP criticism of the Democratic Socialists of America.
His support for the Palestinian cause, immigrant protection, and opposition to police and ICE enforcement makes him an easy target in conservative narratives that equate dissent with disloyalty.

📢 5. Political Timing and Trump’s 2025 Rhetoric

The timing of these attacks aligns with a larger Trump campaign strategy:

Reviving “America First” themes with a focus on deportations and denaturalization.
Targeting high-profile immigrant politicians to galvanize the base and redirect national attention from other policy challenges.

🛡️ What’s Trump Saying?

Former President Donald Trump’s remarks on Zohran Mamdani reflect his familiar mix of political aggression, nationalist rhetoric, and legal posturing—but also leave room for ambiguity. While he hasn’t directly called for Mamdani’s deportation, his statements are fueling public perception that he supports it.

🎙️ Public Remarks & Interviews

In a televised interview following Mamdani’s NYC mayoral primary victory, Trump referred to Mamdani as:

“A total nut job… a communist… the worst kind of person to put in charge of a city already falling apart.”

He further warned:

“If this guy thinks he can stop ICE, he’s got another thing coming. We’re going to have a lot of fun with him. And he’s going to learn real fast what happens when you block federal agents.”

These comments came amid Trump’s broader campaign rhetoric emphasizing law and order, mass deportations, and “taking back our cities from radical leftists.”

🧾 Position on Deportation

Despite fiery language, Trump has not formally called for Mamdani’s deportation—a point clarified by his spokesperson and White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt:

“I have not heard the president say he wants to deport Mamdani. That said, Mamdani’s views are extreme, anti-American, and dangerous.”

Still, Trump’s language heavily implies hostility, and his followers, including figures like Rep. Andy Ogles and former ICE Director Tom Homan, have interpreted his tone as approval of denaturalization and removal efforts.

⚖️ Threats of Federal Intervention

Trump has also threatened to:

Cut off federal funding to cities like NYC if officials refuse to cooperate with ICE.
Prosecute local leaders under obstruction laws if they interfere with federal immigration enforcement.
Declare sanctuary policies unconstitutional if re-elected, targeting leaders like Mamdani as part of that agenda.

📣 Strategic Messaging

Trump’s statements are part of a larger campaign theme:

Paint Democratic cities as lawless.
Brand progressive candidates like Mamdani as enemies of the state.
Use these flashpoints to energize voters concerned about border security, terrorism, and cultural erosion.

⚖️ Is Deportation Legally Viable?

From a strictly legal perspective, deporting Zohran Mamdani is highly unlikely, though not technically impossible. The U.S. Constitution and immigration laws create strong protections for naturalized citizens—but also leave narrow openings that Trump-aligned critics are trying to exploit. Here’s what would have to happen—and why it almost certainly won’t.

🧾 1. Naturalized Citizens Are Full Citizens

Mamdani became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 2018. Under the law, once someone is naturalized, they enjoy nearly all the same rights as natural-born citizens, including:

The right to vote.
The right to hold elected office (except the presidency/vice presidency).
Full protection under the Constitution, including the First Amendment.

This means deportation is off the table unless his citizenship is first revoked—which can only happen under specific and limited conditions.

🚫 2. Grounds for Denaturalization Are Extremely Narrow

The U.S. government can initiate denaturalization proceedings only if the person:

Knowingly lied or concealed material facts during the naturalization process.
Was ineligible for citizenship at the time it was granted.

For example, someone who lied about a criminal past, ties to terrorism, or immigration fraud may be denaturalized. However:

No public evidence shows Mamdani lied or omitted anything material.
Expressing political views, even controversial ones, does not qualify as fraud.

Courts have repeatedly ruled that political beliefs or associations—protected by the First Amendment—cannot be used as the basis for revoking citizenship.

🧠 3. Rap Lyrics and Political Views Aren’t Legal Evidence

Critics point to Mamdani’s 2017 rap lyrics supporting the “Holy Land Five” as proof of radical sympathies. But legally:

Lyrics are considered artistic expression, not sworn statements.
Political or religious sympathies—no matter how unpopular—are not grounds for denaturalization unless they are linked to actual concealment or false statements on a citizenship application.

Legal experts stress that the government would need clear, documented proof that Mamdani:

Was affiliated with a designated terrorist organization at the time of naturalization, and
Knowingly hid that affiliation.

So far, no such evidence has been presented or alleged under oath.

🧑‍⚖️ 4. Even If Denaturalized, Deportation Isn’t Automatic

Let’s assume, hypothetically, Mamdani were denaturalized. What happens next?

He would revert to the last immigration status he held—likely legal permanent resident (green card holder).
To deport him from there, the government would need to prove he:
- Committed a deportable offense (e.g., felony, terrorism support).
- Poses an ongoing threat to national security.

There’s no indication Mamdani has been convicted—or even accused—of such crimes. Denaturalization would not guarantee removal unless more legal thresholds are met.

📚 5. Legal Precedent Is Against It

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled consistently that:

Denaturalization should be rare and treated with “the strictest scrutiny.”
Citizenship cannot be revoked lightly, especially for speech, ideology, or affiliations alone.

Landmark cases:

Afroyim v. Rusk (1967): Citizenship cannot be revoked without consent unless obtained fraudulently.
Schneiderman v. United States (1943): Political beliefs—no matter how extreme—cannot be grounds for revocation unless accompanied by active deception.

⚠️ 6. Politically Motivated Denaturalization Is a Slippery Slope

If deportation efforts based on ideological grounds gain traction, it sets a dangerous precedent:

Thousands of naturalized citizens could be subjected to politically motivated investigations.
It risks eroding trust in the stability of American citizenship.

That’s why legal scholars and civil rights groups are watching Mamdani’s case as a test of constitutional limits and a potential flashpoint in the 2026 election season.

🏛️ Broader Political Context & Concerns

The effort to delegitimize and potentially deport Zohran Mamdani doesn’t exist in a vacuum—it’s part of a much wider, intensifying battle over the future of American identity, immigration, and democratic norms. His case reveals how policy, identity politics, and national elections are converging into a high-stakes cultural conflict.

🧭 1. A Symbolic Target in a National Culture War

Mamdani, a Muslim, immigrant, Democratic Socialist, and vocal critic of Israel, is an ideal target in today’s polarized political environment. His identity and views place him directly at the intersection of:

Immigration policy
Free speech vs. national loyalty
U.S. foreign policy and support for Israel
Urban vs. rural political tensions

Conservatives portray him as the embodiment of “everything wrong” with progressive, sanctuary city politics, while progressives see him as a canary in the coal mine for how dissent is punished in modern America.

🔄 2. Trump-Era Tactics Re-emerging

The Mamdani episode mirrors broader Trump-era political strategies that include:

Criminalizing political opponents, especially minorities and immigrants.
Amplifying fears of “radical infiltration” into government institutions.
Using nativist rhetoric to draw a sharp us-vs-them divide—between “real Americans” and “foreign agitators.”

Under this strategy, calling for deportation—even if legally weak—becomes a political statement meant to energize a base and draw media attention.

🗳️ 3. Election-Year CalculationsWith the 2026 elections looming, both parties are using Mamdani’s case to:

Frame their broader platforms on immigration, free speech, and civil rights.
Stir voter turnout by tapping into deep emotional divides—particularly around issues like:
- Israel-Palestine
- Border security
- The “radical left” vs. “authoritarian right”

This controversy is likely to shape campaign ads, debates, and fundraising, especially in key battleground states and urban districts.

🧱 4. Attack on “Sanctuary” Policies

Mamdani’s open support for sanctuary city policies, including the refusal to cooperate with ICE, has become a lightning rod for Republicans who argue such policies:

Undermine federal law enforcement.
Invite crime and extremism.
Signal disloyalty to the U.S.

Republicans are using Mamdani’s stance to escalate their push for federal override powers, including cutting funding to non-cooperative cities and jailing officials who obstruct ICE.

🧑‍⚖️ 5. Constitutional and Civil Liberties at Risk

Legal scholars and rights advocates warn that this case represents a broader erosion of:

Due process protections for naturalized citizens.
Freedom of expression, particularly political and artistic speech.
The idea that U.S. citizenship—once granted—is permanent and secure.

The use of denaturalization as a political tool risks turning citizenship into a conditional privilege, rather than an unshakable right.

🌐 6. International Optics and Hypocrisy

Globally, the Mamdani saga raises questions about America’s moral authority:

How can the U.S. champion democracy and free speech abroad if it punishes dissent at home?
Deportation threats against a lawmaker over past artistic expression may resemble authoritarian tactics, not democratic norms.

This could damage U.S. credibility, especially in foreign policy contexts where the U.S. positions itself as a defender of liberty and human rights.

⚖️ 1. Legal Resulting Effects

● Weaponization of Naturalization

Using past political speech or artistic expression (like Mamdani’s lyrics) as grounds for deportation sets a dangerous precedent. It could result in:

Naturalized citizens feeling legally insecure, even years after being granted citizenship.
Potential misuse of denaturalization laws for political retaliation.

● Suppression of Free Expression

If political views or lyrics can be used against citizens:

Many may censor their speech to avoid scrutiny.
It could erode First Amendment protections, especially for immigrants and minorities.

🏛️ 2. Political Resulting Effects

● Heightened Political Polarization

This controversy adds fuel to:

The red vs. blue city divide, especially around immigration enforcement.
Debates over what defines “American values.”

● Strategic GOP Messaging

Trump-aligned Republicans may use this to:

Appeal to voters concerned with immigration, national security, and law enforcement.
Reinforce themes of “outsiders” threatening the nation.

● Progressive Mobilization

Progressive politicians use this as a rallying cry to:

Defend civil liberties.
Highlight systemic discrimination.
Mobilize younger, diverse voters in urban areas.

🌐 3. Social and Cultural Resulting Effects

● Rise in Islamophobic Sentiment

Public attacks on Mamdani’s faith and ethnicity may:

Legitimize prejudice against Muslims and immigrants.
Lead to more hate speech and discrimination, online and offline.

● Fear in Immigrant Communities

Naturalized citizens may now worry:

That past opinions or associations could be retroactively punished.
Their citizenship is conditional based on political alignment.

🧭 4. Electoral Resulting Effects

● Energized Political Base

This event may energize:

Hard-right voters who feel the U.S. is under threat from “radicals.”
Progressive voters who view Mamdani as a symbol of resistance.

● Test Case for 2026

This becomes a flashpoint for 2026 races, especially in:

Urban vs. rural battlegrounds.
Debates over sanctuary policies, federal authority, and civil rights.

Bottom Line:

This is not just about defeating Zohran Mamdani at the ballot box—it’s about defending the integrity of American citizenship. If a man can gain entry into this country, secure citizenship, and then rise to power while openly opposing federal law enforcement, supporting convicted terror financiers, and pledging to shield illegal immigrants from justice—then the system is broken, and it must be corrected.

President Trump has the political will and the legal grounds. The Constitution does not protect citizenship obtained through deceit, nor does it require us to tolerate radicals who use their naturalized status as a weapon against the nation that took them in.

Don’t just defeat Mamdani. Deport him. Send the message loud and clear: American citizenship is not a tool for sabotage.

SOURCES: THE GATEWAY PUNDIT – President Trump, There are Legal Grounds to Revoke the Citizenship of Zohran Mamdani. Don’t Just Defeat Mamdani, DEPORT HIM!