Slovak and Serbian Leaders Defy EU Globalists, Will Join Russia’s Victory Day Celebration in Moscow Despite Consequences

Implications:

The decision by Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico and Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić to attend Russia’s Victory Day celebrations in Moscow on May 9, 2025, carries a number of significant geopolitical and domestic implications, especially in relation to the EU, NATO, and the broader Russia-Ukraine conflict.

🌍 Geopolitical Implications

1. Challenge to EU Unity

• Their participation directly defies EU pressure to isolate Russia diplomatically due to its invasion of Ukraine.

• It undermines the EU’s foreign policy coherence, especially in managing the bloc’s stance on Russia.

2. Boost to Russia’s Image

• The attendance of EU and NATO country leaders at a high-profile Russian event sends a signal that Russia is not entirely isolated.

• Putin may use this to prop up domestic support and showcase that some European nations still maintain diplomatic ties.

3. Strain on Serbia’s EU Aspirations

• For Serbia, which is still an EU candidate country, this move risks stalling or even reversing accession talks.

• The EU has warned that alignment with Russian interests contradicts the bloc’s principles and expectations.

4. Formation of a Parallel Bloc?

• The informal cooperation among Hungary, Slovakia, and Serbia (BBB Bloc) suggests the emergence of a nationalist, anti-migration, and more Russia-friendly axis within or near the EU.

• This bloc could act as a counterweight to Brussels, complicating EU decision-making and furthering internal divisions.

🇸🇰🇷🇸 Domestic Implications

1. Backlash and Protests

• Fico is already facing mass protests in Slovakia over his perceived pro-Russian stance and flirtation with EU/NATO withdrawal rhetoric.

• Vučić is facing growing unrest, especially among students and youth, over corruption and governance issues.

2. Risk of Political Isolation

• Both leaders risk alienating mainstream European allies, potentially reducing financial aid, political support, and trade cooperation.

• Their stance may consolidate domestic nationalist support but also energize opposition forces.

🔮 Possible Long-Term Outcomes

• Deepening EU Divisions: The incident could mark a turning point where Eastern European leaders increasingly pursue foreign policies independent of Brussels.

• Serbia’s Neutrality at Risk: Serbia may be forced to choose between closer EU integration or further alignment with Russia and China.

• Increased Russian Soft Power: If more leaders follow Fico and Vučić’s lead, it could embolden Putin’s regime and weaken Western efforts to isolate Russia.

The decision by Slovak and Serbian leaders to attend Russia’s Victory Day despite EU objections signals a growing fracture within Europe’s political unity. It highlights a bold rejection of EU globalist pressure and showcases an emerging alliance of nationalist-leaning, Russia-friendly leaders in Central and Eastern Europe.

While it may play well with domestic nationalist audiences and reinforce historical ties with Russia, the move risks political isolation, jeopardizes Serbia’s EU membership ambitions, and deepens divisions within the EU and NATO. It’s a clear indicator that not all European leaders are willing to toe the Brussels line, even amid a major geopolitical crisis.

In short: This isn’t just a diplomatic visit—it’s a statement. And the ripple effects could reshape alliances in Europe for years to come.