| Published June 11, 2025
A protest outside the Los Angeles Police Department headquarters has reignited national debate over policing, activism, and political alignment, particularly in light of statements by activist group Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) and reactions from public figures. What began as a demonstration over police conduct and immigration enforcement evolved into a flashpoint involving law enforcement, federal agencies, ideological movements, and media commentary.
The protest, organized by a coalition of progressive groups including police abolitionists and pro-Palestinian activists, quickly escalated. Video footage from the scene showed confrontations between demonstrators and LAPD officers. According to authorities, protesters hurled projectiles, damaged property, and in some cases, engaged in physical altercations with both local law enforcement and federal agents, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) personnel.
Among the most controversial responses to the event was a statement released by SJP, which declared support for the protest and described law enforcement agencies using language that critics deemed inflammatory. Their post included the phrase “Globalize the Intifada,” a slogan associated with past uprisings in the Middle East, and included harsh comparisons between modern institutions and historic regimes — including Nazi imagery — to describe law enforcement.
The language drew intense backlash, most notably from conservative commentator Guy Benson, who posted a detailed response on X. In his remarks, Benson wrote that while the Nazi comparisons were “disgusting and ignorant,” they also revealed a deeper contradiction: “They are, after all, great fans of Jew murder, so you’d think they’d admire or envy the Nazis.” He went on to state that SJP’s support for a mob hurling rocks at police and assaulting ICE agents was consistent with what he described as the group’s broader record of supporting violence. He further referenced SJP’s response to the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks, accusing the group of celebrating the slaughter of Israeli civilians.
🔥Townhall’s @guypbenson drops some HARD truths on Democrats regarding the LA riots.
“The people who are burning things, the people who are burning our flag, the people who are assaulting our federal officers — that is EXACTLY the look they’re going for because it’s what they… pic.twitter.com/Sqj19uGZPY
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) June 9, 2025
Pro-terrorism hate group Students for Justice in Palestine publishes a characteristically demented rant in support of violent anti-law enforcement agitation. They end their post with “WE WILL GLOBALIZE THE INTIFADA.” Understand what we are dealing with. pic.twitter.com/46ceNYTBEn
— Guy Benson (@guypbenson) June 8, 2025
Benson concluded his statement by warning about the broader implications of SJP’s messaging, suggesting that if such rhetoric targeted any other minority group, the organization would be banned from campuses nationwide.
Meanwhile, city officials and departments issued their own statements. The LAPD reiterated its commitment to protecting both public safety and the First Amendment right to protest, while acknowledging the challenges posed by demonstrations that devolve into physical altercations. Local leaders, including those associated with the Mayor Karen Bass administration and District Attorney George Gascón, have faced renewed public scrutiny for their stances on policing, protest, and prosecutorial discretion.
The Los Angeles protest comes at a time of heightened tension across several American cities, where issues of racial justice, police reform, and global solidarity movements often converge. In this case, the overlap between domestic protests and international causes — particularly the Israeli-Palestinian conflict — has drawn attention not only from local residents, but from national media and political commentators.
The debate surrounding the protest and the involvement of groups like SJP continues to unfold, as footage circulates, statements are analyzed, and public figures weigh in on what the events reveal about activism, violence, and the boundaries of political expression
Implications
-
Political Legitimacy of Activist Groups Under Scrutiny
The participation of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) in protests involving violence against law enforcement could affect how activist groups are perceived by the public, institutions, and lawmakers. Their language — including calls to “Globalize the Intifada” and Nazi comparisons — may provoke calls for campus bans, investigations, or regulatory responses. -
Increased Polarization in Public Discourse
The sharp rhetorical divide — between progressive groups defending protest as civil resistance and commentators like Guy Benson labeling it pro-terrorist extremism — reflects intensifying political polarization. This deepens the ideological rift on issues like policing, free speech, and Middle East politics, both online and in public institutions. -
Pressure on Local Leadership and Prosecutorial Policy
Los Angeles officials, particularly those associated with criminal justice reform like DA George Gascón, may face renewed criticism over lenient prosecutorial approaches in protest-related violence. Public sentiment and political opponents may use this moment to question city leadership’s handling of both law enforcement and protest activity. -
National Security and Anti-Semitism Monitoring May Expand
Given the invocation of violent slogans and the reference to the October 7 Hamas attacks, federal and campus authorities could intensify scrutiny of groups perceived to glorify terrorism or promote anti-Semitic rhetoric. There may be increased efforts to track speech that advocates for or incites violence under the banner of political causes. -
Campus Policy Reforms Could Be Accelerated
Universities, already under pressure to respond to rising tensions around Israel-Palestine discourse, may feel compelled to act if groups like SJP are seen as inciting or supporting violence. This could include revisiting policies on student group recognition, protest guidelines, and disciplinary action related to hate speech or incitement. -
Law Enforcement-Activist Relations Will Remain Strained
The clash in Los Angeles is a reminder that mutual mistrust between activist communities and law enforcement remains unresolved. These tensions may make it more difficult to facilitate peaceful protest, crowd control, and conflict de-escalation in future demonstrations, particularly those involving high-profile political causes.
Overall Takeaway:
The recent Los Angeles protest outside LAPD headquarters underscores how domestic unrest, international political causes, and aggressive activist rhetoric are increasingly intertwined — with groups like Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) at the center of national controversy. The event revealed not only the physical tension between protesters and law enforcement, but also the escalating war of words between political commentators, civic leaders, and activist organizations.
The widespread reaction to SJP’s endorsement of the protest — particularly in light of violent confrontations and provocative language referencing Nazi imagery and calls to “Globalize the Intifada” — highlights growing concerns over how far political activism can go before it is viewed as incitement or extremism. As figures like Guy Benson amplify those concerns, and as law enforcement agencies report rising aggression during demonstrations, local governments, universities, and the public are forced to confront difficult questions about free speech, public safety, and the limits of ideological expression.
SOURCE: TOWNHALL – Surprise: Guess Who’s Aggressively Supporting Anti-Law Enforcement Rioters in LA?
Be the first to comment