Image: Bombshell: New Climate Study Shows Zero Carbon Impact On Warming
Related: The Sheer #%&@! Gall of Nature Magazine. EU Chief Science Advisers Say Democracy Depends on Trusted Science, and Ignore How the Trust Was Squandered
Video: CDN
John Robson comments on key items from the latest Climate Discussion Nexus weekly “Wednesday Wakeup” newsletter (https://climatediscussionnexus.com/ne…, starting with an AP story about the UN retreating on climate change that packs six major errors into just 52 words, moving on, or back, to persistent claims that we know the temperature to two decimal places including for every drop of water on the surface of the seven seas, more efforts to blame the lack of Atlantic hurricanes on El Niño, moving on to National Geographic accidentally discovering the Medieval Warm Period while exploring the Pacific and throwing it back, Roger Pielke Jr. catching the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine violating their mandate and values to hype climate disaster, the boredom of NYC Climate Week, the climate cult abandoning evolution for panic over blue crabs, the government of Quebec rejecting fracking over imaginary perils but importing Chinese high-tech gear despite real ones, and wrapping up with an installment in our #CanaryInAClimateWorld series on William Kininmonth on basic flaws in the orthodox CO2 theory that point to ocean currents as drivers instead, a Nature paper on climate change driving accelerating drought that actually got retracted without the hype getting retracted, Salt Marsh Rush would be a cool band name but is actually a plant that grows well in salt water especially with lots of CO2
Still below 1936
Why is it that the “Green” Rent & Grant Seeking Community of Activists and Criminals, mostly CRIMINALS, have to counterfeit climate data? Would they have done that if the measured data actually did show a problem?
