| Published May 4, 2024
A recent analysis by the Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project has raised concerns regarding the increased use of autopen signatures by former President Joe Biden, suggesting a correlation with perceptions of his cognitive decline. The investigation found that, while Biden initially used a wet signature for executive orders during the first 18 months of his presidency, the use of autopen signatures escalated significantly thereafter. By late spring 2022, approximately half of the executive orders were signed using an autopen; by summer 2022, this had increased to 100%. In 2023, two-thirds of the orders were signed with an autopen, and in 2024, that figure rose to three-quarters, with the final days of his presidency seeing all executive orders signed by autopen.
“All used the same autopen signature except for the announcement that the former President was dropping out of the race last year.”
The Oversight Project divulged examples of Biden’s signatures on two executive orders that it surmised came from autopen and contrasted that with an image of his signature on the letter announcing he was pulling out of the 2024 presidential contest.
The organisation released further analysis finding that Biden’s pardons for family members, Anthony Fauci, General Milley, J6 Committee members, and Gerald Lundergan were all autopenned.
Now a further analysis of Executive Order signatures shows an “increased use of the autopen as President Biden’s mental and physical decline accelerated,” according to the group.
This shift has prompted legal and ethical concerns. Critics argue that the widespread use of autopen signatures may undermine the authenticity and constitutional validity of executive actions, particularly if they were signed without the president’s direct involvement or awareness. Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey has called for a Department of Justice investigation into whether Biden’s cognitive state allowed unelected staff to implement policies without his informed consent.
While the use of autopen signatures is legally permissible under Department of Justice guidelines, the extent to which they were employed during Biden’s presidency has raised questions about transparency and accountability in the executive branch. The controversy underscores ongoing debates about presidential health, decision-making processes, and the mechanisms through which executive authority is exercised.
Here are the implications of the increasing use of autopen signatures by President Biden, as highlighted by recent analysis:
1. Concerns Over Presidential Autonomy and Accountability
The increased use of autopen raises questions about the level of direct involvement and decision-making from President Biden in key executive actions. Critics argue that if the president is not personally signing orders or is unaware of their contents, it could undermine the accountability of his administration and weaken public trust in the integrity of executive decisions.
2. Legal and Constitutional Challenges
The growing use of autopen has led to concerns regarding the constitutional legitimacy of executive actions. While legal guidelines allow for the use of autopen under certain conditions, questions about whether it compromises the authenticity of decisions could spark legal challenges, especially if it is perceived that decisions are being made by unelected officials or staff without direct presidential oversight.
3. Public Perception of Cognitive Decline
The use of autopen has intensified public scrutiny of President Biden’s cognitive health, potentially reinforcing perceptions of mental decline. Critics have used this development as evidence of diminished mental capacity, which could fuel political narratives questioning his ability to effectively lead. This could become a central talking point in political campaigns and public discourse.
4. Impact on Political Legitimacy
As the controversy surrounding Biden’s use of autopen escalates, it could contribute to growing political polarization. Opponents of Biden may seize on this issue to frame his presidency as compromised or less legitimate, which may influence voter opinions, especially in the run-up to the next election.
5. Legal Precedents and Future Presidents
The controversy surrounding Biden’s autopen usage could set a precedent for future administrations. If legal and ethical concerns are raised successfully, it may lead to stricter guidelines for autopen use in future presidencies. This could affect the way future presidents handle executive orders and their level of personal involvement in decision-making processes.
6. Transparency and Trust in Government
The perception that autopen is being used more frequently can contribute to a broader sense of mistrust in government. Transparency about the decision-making process is vital to maintaining public confidence, and this controversy may spark calls for greater transparency regarding the use of autopen and other delegated actions.
7. Potential Political Fallout
The ongoing focus on this issue could divert attention from substantive policy debates, instead fueling discussions about Biden’s ability to perform his duties. This could shape the political discourse leading up to future elections, particularly if it becomes a central issue for opposition parties.
Overall Takeaway:
The increasing use of autopen signatures by President Biden has sparked significant controversy, raising concerns about transparency, accountability, and the authenticity of executive actions. While legally permissible, the practice has become a focal point for critics who question the president’s direct involvement in key decisions, fueling perceptions of cognitive decline. This issue not only threatens to undermine public trust in the administration but also adds fuel to political debates surrounding Biden’s fitness for office. The controversy may set legal and ethical precedents that affect future administrations, making it a key issue in both political and legal discourse moving forward.
SOURCES: ZEROHEDGE – Biden Autopen Use Increased As Cognitive Decline Deepened, Analysis Finds
THE NEW YORK POST – Biden used ‘autopen signature’ on many official WH docs, raising concerns over his awareness
THE SUN – NOT SCRAWL THERE Bungling Biden ‘didn’t even sign his official docs’ as autopen signature ‘pasted President’s name on almost everything’
Be the first to comment