Ashli Babbitt, American patriot and victim of government violence
| Published May 3, 2025
The U.S. Department of Justice has reached a preliminary settlement with the family of Ashli Babbitt, the Air Force veteran fatally shot by a Capitol Police officer during the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. The wrongful death lawsuit, filed by Babbitt’s estate, alleged negligence and excessive force. While the settlement’s terms remain undisclosed, the agreement marks a significant development in the legal aftermath of the Capitol events.
The lawsuit extensively details the history of incompetence and multiple revocations of firearm privileges for previous dangerous incidents involving Officer Michael Byrd, the Capitol Police officer who murdered Babbitt in cold blood.
This includes a failure “to meet or complete semiannual firearms qualification requirements,” leaving a “loaded Glock 22—the same firearm he used to shoot and kill Ashli Babbitt – in a bathroom in the Capitol Visitor Center,” and a shooting into a moving vehicle stolen by teenagers, where the off-duty cop reportedly struck homes nearby with his bullets.
“Lt. Byrd had a reputation among peers for not being a good shot,” the lawsuit alleges.
As the third anniversary of Jan. 6 approaches, Judicial Watch has filed a $30 million wrongful death suit against the federal government for the Capitol Police shooting of Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt.
The Washington Examiner reports that the suit was filed on behalf of Babbitt’s estate and her husband, Aaron Babbitt, and claims the officer who shot Babbitt was “incompetent” and “dangerous” and should have recognized Babbitt posed no threat to Congress when she entered the House speaker’s lobby.
Kyle Cheney from Politico posted the news on X this Friday afternoon.
UPDATE: The radical leftist judge on the case, Ana Reyes, is SCREAMING at both sides in the courtroom. Insane!
Via Julie Kelly:
🇺🇸 Conservative Perspective: Key Implications
⚖️ 1. Acknowledgment of Government Accountability
The settlement suggests a recognition of potential shortcomings in the actions of law enforcement during the Capitol breach. For conservatives, this may be seen as a step toward holding government agencies accountable for their responses during crises.
🛡️ 2. Reinforcement of Civil Liberties
The case underscores the importance of safeguarding civil liberties, even amid national emergencies. The settlement could be interpreted as a reaffirmation of the principle that the use of force by authorities must be judicious and justified.
🗳️ 3. Impact on Public Trust
The resolution of this high-profile case may influence public perception of government transparency and justice. For some conservatives, it might restore a measure of trust in the legal system’s ability to address grievances against state actions.
🧭 Overall Takeaway
The preliminary settlement between the Justice Department and Ashli Babbitt’s family represents a pivotal moment in addressing the complexities surrounding the January 6 incident. While it does not equate to an admission of guilt, the agreement may be viewed as a commitment to resolving contentious issues through legal channels. For conservatives, it highlights the ongoing need to balance security measures with the preservation of individual rights and governmental accountability.
SOURCES: THE GATEWAY PUNDIT – BREAKING: Settlement in Principle Reached in Ashli Babbitt Lawsuit — The Young Woman Gunned Down in US Capitol on Jan. 6 – CRAZED BIDEN JUDGE Starts Screaming in Courtroom
REDSTATE – DOJ Reaches Agreement to Settle Lawsuit by Family of Ashli Babbitt
TOWNHALL – Ashli Babbit’s Family Gets Justice – Sort Of
Be the first to comment