| Published May 6, 2025
🇧🇩 Bangladesh’s Actions and Statements
The article points to several incidents suggesting a shift in Bangladesh’s stance towards India:
-
Retired Major General A.L.M. Fazlur Rahman advocated for Bangladesh to consider occupying India’s Northeastern states if India were to engage in conflict with Pakistan. Although the Bangladeshi government distanced itself from this statement, it nonetheless strained bilateral trust.
-
Interim Bangladeshi leader Muhammad Yunus made controversial remarks about India’s Northeastern states during a visit to China, implying a willingness to support separatist movements if India doesn’t make concessions to Bangladesh.
-
In late December, Mahfuj Alam, a special assistant to Yunus, shared a provocative map on social media that appeared to claim parts of India’s territory.
While these actions are not official territorial claims, they are seen as “plausibly deniable” provocations that have heightened India’s threat perceptions.
🇮🇳 India’s Response
India’s Border Security Force (BSF) has rejected reports suggesting that Bangladesh has taken control of Indian land, labeling them as “baseless and irresponsible.” The BSF emphasized that the international boundary is well-demarcated and that their duty patterns have remained unchanged.
In another instance, the BSF refuted claims that Bangladesh had started 24-hour patrolling of a 5-km stretch of Indian land, calling such reports “concocted stories.”
🧭 Historical Context
Despite past efforts to resolve border disputes—such as the 2015 Land Boundary Agreement, which simplified the India-Bangladesh border by exchanging enclaves—the recent developments suggest a potential shift in Bangladesh’s approach to its relationship with India.
Here’s a clear breakdown of the pros and cons regarding Bangladesh’s recent plausibly deniable territorial gestures toward India:
✅ Pros (From Bangladesh’s Perspective)
-
Domestic Political Signaling
-
Provocative rhetoric and maps may rally nationalist sentiment at home, bolstering political factions or interim leaders seeking legitimacy.
-
-
Strategic Leverage
-
These gestures could serve as bargaining chips in future negotiations with India on water-sharing, trade, or border issues.
-
-
Regional Alignment and Diversification
-
Aligning more closely with China (as suggested by visits and comments) may provide economic and military benefits, reducing reliance on India.
-
-
Testing Indian Response
-
Bangladesh may be probing India’s red lines without engaging in official conflict, measuring how far it can push rhetoric and perception.
-
❌ Cons (For Regional Stability and Bilateral Relations)
-
Strained India-Bangladesh Relations
-
These moves risk damaging years of diplomatic progress, including the landmark 2015 Land Boundary Agreement.
-
-
Security Consequences
-
India may tighten military posture or border enforcement, increasing chances of clashes or standoffs.
-
-
Economic Repercussions
-
Rising tensions could impact trade, joint projects, or cross-border cooperation, hurting both economies.
-
-
International Reputation Damage
-
Bangladesh may face criticism for undermining regional stability, especially if its actions are seen as provocations supported by external powers like China.
-
-
Loss of Plausible Deniability
-
If patterns persist, the international community may stop viewing them as isolated incidents and instead interpret them as strategic intent, which could backfire diplomatically.
-
🔍 Overall Takeaway
The series of provocative statements and actions from Bangladeshi figures, though not official policy, have raised concerns in India about Bangladesh’s intentions. These developments could strain the historically cooperative relationship between the two nations and may prompt India to reassess its diplomatic and security strategies in the region.
SOURCES: ZEROHEDGE – Bangladesh Is Back At It Again With Another “Plausibly Deniable” Territorial Claim To India
Be the first to comment