NEVER FORGET: Comey, Mueller, Brennan, Obama Lied about Russia Hacking the 2016 Election – And Their Alleged Source Crowdstrike NEVER had Evidence that the DNC was Hacked or that Russia Was Involved

| Published July 31, 2025

🔍 What the article asserts:

• It claims Barack Obama, James Comey, John Brennan, James Clapper, and others knowingly lied to the public, pushing the “Russia hacked the DNC and forwarded emails to WikiLeaks” story despite alleged lack of evidence from CrowdStrike

• It cites statements from cybersecurity expert Yaacov Apelbaum suggesting data may have been copied internally (e.g., via USB), not hacked externally

• It also references declassified intelligence documents purportedly showing suppression of contradicting information in 2016 (linked to Adam Schiff delays and Tulsi Gabbard’s release)

📌 Broader context & expert analysis:

1. CrowdStrike’s findings: CrowdStrike itself publicly reported it had strong indicators that the DNC servers were breached by state-linked actors (attributed to Russian-backed groups). While they used cautious language like “indicators” vs. definitive proof, the broader intelligence community backed their assessment. The claim that CrowdStrike had “absolutely no evidence” is not supported by mainstream sources.

2. Intelligence assessments & investigations:

   • The 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) concluded Russia interfered in the 2016 election on behalf of Trump. Although a House report recently criticized aspects of the process—such as inclusion of the Steele dossier and internal dissent—that report did not deny interference occurred

   • A former CIA officer, Susan Miller, responded to claims (particularly those by Tulsi Gabbard) that Obama administration officials manipulated intelligence. Miller described such accusations as “baseless,” affirming the intelligence was data-driven, not politically constructed

3. Criminal referrals:

   • John Brennan and James Comey are under DOJ investigation for purported false statements to Congress and possible conspiratorial activities related to the ICA process. These are investigatory referrals; no charges or convictions have been announced as of now

4. Durham investigation & DOJ reviews:

   • Special Counsel John Durham’s earlier probe concluded that the FBI misjudged some actions in the Crossfire Hurricane investigation, citing reliance on uncorroborated intelligence and confirmation bias—but it did not uncover evidence of a political conspiracy or fabrication on the part of Obama‑era officials

 Implications:

Here are the key implications of the Gateway Pundit article titled “NEVER FORGET: Comey, Mueller, Brennan, Obama Lied about Russia Hacking the 2016 Election”—especially if its claims were accepted as accurate or gain further traction:

🧠 1. Trust in Intelligence Agencies Would Be Undermined

• If top officials like Brennan, Comey, and Clapper knowingly misled the public, it would cast doubt on the credibility of U.S. intelligence institutions (CIA, FBI, NSA).

• This could erode public trust not only in those agencies but in future assessments on foreign threats, terrorism, and cyber warfare.

⚖️ 2. Potential Legal or Political Fallout

• If investigations into Brennan, Comey, or others result in criminal charges (for perjury, obstruction, or conspiracy), it would lead to a historical reckoning for Obama-era officials.

• Politicians involved in promoting the Russia collusion narrative (like Adam Schiff) could face ethics complaints or censure.

• Lawsuits or demands for reform in surveillance, cybersecurity, and internal oversight could follow.

🗳️ 3. The 2016 and 2020 Elections Could Be Reframed

• If the Russia hack narrative was false or exaggerated, the legitimacy of investigations like the Mueller probe would be questioned even more deeply.

• Supporters of Trump would frame this as vindication, potentially rewriting how the public remembers the 2016 election and its aftermath.

• It could affect how voters see other investigations—such as those involving Trump’s indictments—possibly viewing them as part of a broader political pattern.

🌐 4. U.S. Foreign Policy Could Shift

• The “Russia interference” narrative helped justify sanctions, NATO buildup, and cyber doctrine changes.

• If the narrative is delegitimized, calls could emerge to re-evaluate U.S. posture toward Russia, especially among anti-interventionist or populist factions.

📰 5. Media Accountability Would Be Challenged

• If it’s proven that mainstream outlets amplified false intelligence narratives, calls for media reform, defunding, or boycotts would intensify.

• Conservative media (like Gateway Pundit, Fox, or Rumble voices) would gain influence among skeptics of corporate media.

📜 6. History and Educational Narratives Would Be Disputed

• The “Russia collusion” issue has been embedded in books, documentaries, and academic discussions. If disproven, textbooks, university lectures, and media archives would require revision.

• There could be pressure to declassify more records from 2016–2018, as a transparency push or accountability measure.

💣 7. Polarization Would Intensify

• The issue isn’t just about truth vs. falsehood—it’s about who gets to define political reality.

• If half the country views Brennan and Obama as conspirators and the other half defends them as patriots, the U.S. political divide could deepen, potentially destabilizing future elections.

 Overall Takeaway:

The article raises serious allegations that, if proven true, could upend widely accepted narratives about the 2016 election and the integrity of top U.S. intelligence officials. It challenges the official story that Russia hacked the DNC and portrays the investigation into Donald Trump as politically driven from the start.

At stake is more than just reputations—the credibility of federal agencies, the legacy of a former president, and the public’s trust in both media and democratic institutions hang in the balance. Whether these claims lead to legal accountability or fade into partisan debate, they underline a broader crisis: Americans are no longer united on what constitutes truth, evidence, or justice.

In the end, this isn’t just about 2016. It’s about how power is used, how narratives are built, and who controls the story in a democracy. The consequences will shape how future intelligence is handled, how elections are judged, and how citizens interpret the motives behind political investigations—on both sides.

SOURCES: THE GATEWAY PUNDIT – NEVER FORGET: Comey, Mueller, Brennan, Obama Lied about Russia Hacking the 2016 Election – And Their Alleged Source Crowdstrike NEVER had Evidence that the DNC was Hacked or that Russia Was Involved

FOX NEWS – FBI launches criminal investigations of John Brennan, James Comey: DOJ sources