Crime Runs in the Family! Letitia James Buys Home for Niece’s Jailbird Adult Kids

| Published May 30, 2025

New York Attorney General Letitia James is reported to have purchased a house in Norfolk, Virginia, for her niece Shamice Thompson-Hairston, who is 53 years old. The controversy centers on the fact that Thompson-Hairston’s adult children—James’s grand-nieces and grand-nephews—have significant criminal histories, including felony charges.

The article alleges that this purchase was framed as a way to help family members, but critics highlight the criminal backgrounds of these adult children, implying concerns about judgment and the optics of aiding individuals with serious legal issues.

This raises questions about James’s role in supporting family members with criminal pasts, as well as broader ethical concerns about public officials’ use of resources and influence when it involves relatives connected to crime.7

Here are the implications of Letitia James buying a home for her niece’s adult children with criminal records:

1. Ethical and Legal Scrutiny

The purchase raises questions about whether James misrepresented facts on mortgage documents, potentially exposing her to accusations of mortgage fraud.
Supporting family members with criminal records can fuel concerns about judgment and integrity, especially for a public official tasked with upholding the law.

2. Political Fallout

Opponents may use this issue to question James’s fitness for office and undermine her credibility in ongoing or future political campaigns.
It could damage her public image as a law enforcement leader, eroding trust among constituents who expect transparency and ethical conduct.

3. Impact on Public Trust

The revelation may deepen skepticism about politicians using their positions to benefit family members, contributing to a broader narrative of political corruption or favoritism.
Could reduce public confidence in the Attorney General’s office and its commitment to justice.

4. Legal Consequences

The FBI’s criminal investigation might lead to formal charges if evidence of mortgage fraud or other illegal activity is found.
Legal battles could distract James and her office from focusing on other important state matters.

5. Media and Opponent Scrutiny

Increased media attention and opposition research will likely keep this issue in the spotlight, prolonging the controversy.
Could trigger more investigations into James’s past dealings or family associations.

Overall Takeaway:

The controversy over Letitia James purchasing a home for her niece’s adult children—who have criminal records—raises serious ethical and legal questions about her judgment and transparency. While James denies wrongdoing, the FBI investigation and media scrutiny threaten to damage her reputation and political future. This case highlights the challenges public officials face in maintaining trust while managing family matters, especially when those matters involve individuals with troubled pasts.