Fergie’s Epstein lies exposed in bombshell email: She publicly apologised for taking abuser’s cash and vowed to cut ties with him, then weeks later told him: I only said it to save book deals

Just weeks after publicly disowning paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, Sarah Ferguson wrote him a gushing private message calling him a ‘steadfast, generous and supreme friend’ – and admitting she only distanced herself from him to save her own reputation. The Duchess ‘humbly apologised’ to the convicted sex offender for letting him down, and said she had been told to speak out if she wanted to save her career as a children’s author. She sent the grovelling message ‘from the truth of my heart’, less than two months after telling journalists: ‘I will never have anything to do with [Epstein] again.’

Published September 21, 2025

A recently leaked email from April 2011 has reignited controversy surrounding Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, revealing that she apologized to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein weeks after publicly denouncing him. In the email, Ferguson referred to Epstein as her “steadfast, generous and supreme friend,” expressing remorse for distancing herself from him and stating she had been “bedridden with fear” and “paralyzed” by the situation. She claimed she was advised to sever ties to protect her career and charitable work, particularly her role as a children’s author.

This revelation contradicts her public statement from March 2011, where she declared she would “never have anything to do with [Epstein] again” following backlash over accepting a £15,000 gift from him. Her spokesperson later confirmed the authenticity of the email but emphasized her enduring regret over the association, stating that Epstein had threatened her legally for publicly condemning him.

The scandal has reignited discussions about the extent of Epstein’s influence over British royals, particularly Prince Andrew, who had longstanding ties with Epstein and cut ties only after public scrutiny. Leaked emails suggest Andrew communicated with Epstein years after claiming their relationship ended, contradicting statements made during his infamous BBC Newsnight interview. Virginia Giuffre, who accused Andrew of sexually abusing her when she was 17, has called for a thorough investigation into his ties to Epstein.

This development adds to the ongoing scrutiny of the Epstein scandal, with new documents and emails potentially shedding light on the extent of his connections with various individuals, including members of the British royal family.

🕵️‍♂️ The 2011 Apology Email: A Contradiction Unveiled

In April 2011, Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, sent a private email to Jeffrey Epstein, referring to him as her “steadfast, generous and supreme friend.” This message starkly contradicted her public disavowal of Epstein just weeks earlier, where she had condemned his actions and pledged to sever ties. The email expressed remorse for distancing herself, stating she had been advised to do so to protect her career and charitable endeavors. Ferguson admitted to feeling “broken” and manipulated into the distancing, highlighting the pressure she faced during that period.

Sarah Ferguson sent a grovelling apology to Jeffrey Epstein and hailed him a ‘supreme friend’Credit: Getty

💬 Public Statements vs. Private Correspondence

Ferguson’s public statements in March 2011 included a strong condemnation of Epstein, stating, “I abhor paedophilia and any sexual abuse of children.” She also acknowledged accepting £15,000 from Epstein to settle debts, which she later described as a “gigantic error of judgment.” However, the leaked email reveals a different narrative, suggesting that her public denouncement was influenced by external pressures rather than personal conviction. This discrepancy raises questions about the authenticity of public apologies made under duress.

Prince Andrew is pictured walking through New York’s Central Park with Epstein in 2010Credit: Jae Donnelly

⚖️ Legal Pressures and Career Considerations

Ferguson’s representatives have stated that she was manipulated by Epstein and only attempted to appease him under legal duress. The threat of legal action from Epstein reportedly played a significant role in her decision to send the apology email. This situation underscores the complex interplay between personal relationships, legal considerations, and public image, especially for individuals in the public eye.

 Implications

The leaked email from Sarah Ferguson apologizing to Jeffrey Epstein carries several implications, both personal and broader:

1. Damage to Public Image

• Ferguson publicly distanced herself from Epstein in 2011, yet privately expressed remorse and praised him in her email.

• This contradiction could seriously undermine public trust in her statements, painting her as disingenuous or overly influenced by private pressures.

2. Royal Family Scrutiny

• The revelation fuels ongoing scrutiny of the British royal family’s connections to Epstein.

• Prince Andrew, already under investigation and criticism for his ties to Epstein, faces renewed questions about the family’s judgment and potential exposure to scandal.

3. Legal and Ethical Questions

• Ferguson claims Epstein threatened her legally, which suggests a coercive dynamic.

• While no criminal wrongdoing is alleged on her part, the emails could be used to question the ethical boundaries and decision-making of royals in interactions with known criminals.

4. Media and Public Narrative

• Leaks like this reinforce narratives about Epstein’s wide-reaching influence, showing that even high-profile individuals felt compelled to maintain contact despite public condemnation.

• The public may perceive the royals as being manipulative or compromising their reputations due to fear, legal pressure, or social leverage.

5. Historical Context and Investigations

• This email adds evidence to ongoing investigations into Epstein’s network, showing potential patterns of influence, apology, or obfuscation among elites.

• Virginia Giuffre and other victims could point to these communications to argue for deeper scrutiny of Epstein’s connections.

 Overall Takeaway:

The leaked email from Sarah Ferguson apologizing to Jeffrey Epstein underscores the complicated and often contradictory nature of high-profile relationships with notorious figures. While Ferguson publicly condemned Epstein, her private correspondence reveals lingering ties and a sense of obligation or fear, highlighting the intense pressure and influence Epstein exerted over those around him.

For the British royal family, these revelations reinforce ongoing scrutiny of their judgment, ethics, and personal associations. Prince Andrew’s own ties to Epstein, combined with Ferguson’s private communications, amplify questions about accountability and transparency.

Ultimately, this episode illustrates how public statements and private actions can diverge dramatically under coercive or high-stakes circumstances, leaving reputations vulnerable and intensifying media and public scrutiny.

SOURCES: DAILYMAIL ONLINE – Fergie’s Epstein lies exposed in bombshell email: She publicly apologised for taking abuser’s cash and vowed to cut ties with him, then weeks later told him: I only said it to save book deals