
| Published June 7, 2025
In a recent interview, Representative Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) stated, “I don’t know of a single Democrat who defended him…specifically against any crimes,” referring to Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national deported from the U.S. under controversial circumstances. This comment has sparked debate, as it appears to contrast with earlier actions and statements by Raskin and other Democrats advocating for Abrego Garcia’s return.
Context of Raskin’s Statement
Raskin’s recent remark seems to focus on the distinction between defending Abrego Garcia’s legal rights and defending him against specific criminal allegations. While Democrats, including Raskin, have been vocal about the due process concerns surrounding Abrego Garcia’s deportation, they have not necessarily addressed the criminal charges he faces.
Previous Advocacy Efforts
In April 2025, Raskin, along with other Maryland lawmakers, issued a statement demanding the Trump administration comply with a Supreme Court ruling to facilitate Abrego Garcia’s return to the U.S., emphasizing the importance of due process and the rule of law.
Additionally, Raskin criticized El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele for his cooperation with the Trump administration’s deportation policies, suggesting that Democrats should reconsider foreign aid to countries that support such actions.
Interpreting the Discrepancy
The apparent contradiction in Raskin’s statements may stem from a nuanced position: advocating for the protection of legal rights and due process without commenting on the validity of criminal charges. This distinction is crucial in legal and political discourse, where defending procedural rights does not equate to asserting an individual’s innocence.
🚨Jamie Raskin in desperate spin mode on Democrat hero Abrego-Garcia, now charged with human trafficking:
“I don’t know of a single Democrat who defended him…specifically against any crimes.”
“He got unceremoniously picked up and flown out of the country. That’s called a… pic.twitter.com/44r6UA2HjH
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) June 6, 2025
Here’s Raskin himself defending Garcia:
Jamie Raskin is now claiming that Democrats never defended Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
Here’s one of the many times Raskin himself defended Garcia. pic.twitter.com/iCPHHnVkuc
— MAZE (@mazemoore) June 7, 2025
🚨Jamie Raskin in desperate spin mode on Democrat hero Abrego-Garcia, now charged with human trafficking:
“I don’t know of a single Democrat who defended him…specifically against any crimes.”
“He got unceremoniously picked up and flown out of the country. That’s called a… pic.twitter.com/44r6UA2HjH
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) June 6, 2025
All the Democrats do is lie. Why they picked this particular guy to celebrate as some kind of hero is anyone’s guess.
Jamie Raskin’s statement that “Democrats never defended Kilmar Abrego Garcia” carries several political and strategic implications:
1. Distancing from Controversy
By clarifying that no Democrat defended Abrego Garcia against criminal charges, Raskin is attempting to distance the Democratic Party from potential political fallout. This protects Democrats from being portrayed as soft on crime or aligned with individuals accused of serious offenses like human smuggling.
2. Reframing the Narrative
Raskin’s statement reframes past Democratic actions not as support for Abrego Garcia personally, but as a defense of due process. This distinction seeks to preserve the party’s integrity while maintaining a principled stance on legal rights and the limits of executive power.
3. Shielding the Party Ahead of Elections
With immigration and law enforcement becoming flashpoints in election season, this distancing strategy can prevent Republicans from weaponizing the Abrego case against Democrats—particularly in swing districts.
4. Underscoring Legal Neutrality
The implication is that upholding the rule of law should not be mistaken for siding with an accused individual. This reinforces a message of impartial justice—critical for lawmakers like Raskin with legal backgrounds.
5. Highlighting Political Tensions
It also hints at a deeper divide in how immigration cases are framed: one side focusing on process and rights, the other on criminality and enforcement. Raskin’s comment attempts to walk a fine line between these poles.
Overall Takeaway:
Democrats are drawing a clear line between defending due process and endorsing individuals accused of crimes. By stating that no Democrat defended Kilmar Abrego Garcia against criminal charges, Raskin aims to protect the party from political attacks while reaffirming a commitment to legal fairness—not personal vindication. It’s a strategic move to uphold principles without absorbing the baggage of the case.
SOURCES: THE GATEWAY PUNDIT – Jamie Raskin Claims Democrats Never Defended Kilmar Abrego Garcia – Video Evidence Proves Him Wrong
FOX NEWS – Democratic lawmaker argues his party shouldn’t look kindly on foreign governments aiding Trump
Be the first to comment