Screenshot: New York State Attorney General / Facebook
| Published March 21, 2025
New York Attorney General Letitia James, known for her rigorous enforcement of financial laws, is now under scrutiny for alleged discrepancies in her own financial dealings. Recent investigations have uncovered potential misrepresentations in her property holdings and mortgage applications, raising questions about her adherence to the standards she upholds.
Read more here:
Allegations of Misrepresented Property Units
In 2011, James refinanced her Brooklyn apartment building through the federal Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), securing a 2.7% government-backed loan. Eligibility for such favorable terms required the property to have no more than four units. James’s loan documents indicate that her building had four units; however, the official Certificate of Occupancy lists five apartments. This discrepancy suggests that James may have misrepresented the property’s size to qualify for the loan, a tactic she has prosecuted others for employing.
114-04 Inwood Street in Queens, New York
Financial Hardship Claims Under Question
To qualify for the HAMP loan, applicants must demonstrate financial hardship. In 2011, James reported an income of over $126,390, raising doubts about her eligibility for such assistance. Critics argue that claiming financial hardship under these circumstances could constitute a misrepresentation, potentially undermining the integrity of the program designed to assist those in genuine need.
Inconsistencies in Property Ownership Documentation
Further complicating matters, a 1983 property transaction involving James and her father, Robert James, has surfaced. Documents from the New York City Department of Finance reveal that both were listed as “husband and wife” on a mortgage loan application for a property in Queens. Conversely, the deed for the same property describes Letitia James as Robert James’s daughter. This inconsistency raises concerns about potential misrepresentation to secure the mortgage, as such discrepancies can be indicative of attempts to meet lending criteria improperly.
Source: New York City Department of Finance
Source: New York City Department of Finance
Broader Implications and Calls for Accountability
These revelations have sparked a broader debate about accountability and ethical conduct among public officials. James’s position as Attorney General involves holding individuals and corporations accountable for financial improprieties. Allegations that she may have engaged in similar practices could undermine public trust in her office and its initiatives. Observers note that the credibility of regulatory and enforcement actions depends significantly on the personal integrity of those at the helm.
As investigations continue, the public awaits responses from Attorney General James regarding these allegations. The outcomes could have significant ramifications for her career and the standards of accountability expected from public servants.
SOURCES: THE GATEWAY PUNDIT – Mortgage Fraud Alert: Did Letitia James Marry Her Father?
LOU DOBBS – Big Development: Is Letitia James Guilty of Mortgage Fraud?
WHITE COLLAR FRAUD – Exposed: Letitia James’ Handwritten Mortgage Modifications Raise Fraud Questions
FINGER LAKES1 – REPORT: AG James property holdings spark questions
Be the first to comment