
Screenshot: Life, Liberty & Levin / Fox News
THE GATEWAY PUNDIT | Published March 2, 2025
After the catastrophic dumpster fire of a release surrounding the long-awaited Jeffrey Epstein files on Thursday, Attorney General Pam Bondi has delivered a scathing update on the deep corruption and obstruction within the FBI regarding these explosive documents.
Bondi, appearing on Fox News’ Life, Liberty & Levin on Thursday, revealed that she had been assured there were only 120 pages of files to release—but a whistleblower has since exposed that the FBI’s New York office is sitting on thousands of undisclosed pages.
Last Thursday’s much-hyped release of “The Epstein Files: Phase One” fell flat for many patriots hungry for the truth.
The 120-page dump, handed over to a select group of MAGA influencers, was a heavily redacted dud—mostly rehashed info we’ve seen before.
Bondi had promised Fox News’ Jesse Watters a day earlier that the documents would include “flight logs, names, and a lot of information” about Epstein’s sick criminal empire.
“Jesse… this will make you sick. 200 victims, 200! Well over 250, actually. We have to make sure that their identity is protected and their personal information. But other than that, I think tomorrow, Jesse, breaking news right now, you’re going to see some Epstein information being released by my office,” Bondi told Watters on Wednesday.
With over 250 victims identified, conservatives were expecting a bombshell to finally expose the elites who palled around with the disgraced pedophile. Instead, we got a measly stack of papers that we’ve seen before.
During a new interview with Mark Levin, Bondi provided a crucial update, confirming that she had only received about 120 pages of documents—despite being “assured” this was all that existed.
But through an independent source, she discovered that the Southern District of New York (SDNY) has been sitting on thousands of pages related to Epstein, keeping them away from the public eye.
Mark Levin
I want to get into this Epstein thing a little bit. I think the American people are very curious about who’s on this list or these lists. You have been doggedly trying to get all the information. Now we learn, thanks to you, that you’ve been stonewalled by people in New York. Do you want to explain that?Pam Bondi
Yes, Mark. As you know, we released about 120 pages of documents, and I started asking for these documents right when I came into office—before Kash Patel was in there. I ended up getting about 120 pages. We carefully redacted them, of course, to ensure that the 254 young girls—victims of sex crimes and sex trafficking—had their personal information protected.So I’m going through it, and I kept saying, “There has to be more, there has to be more.” I was assured that was it. Kash asked the same questions and was also assured there was no more.
Then I found out this week that a source told me New York’s SDNY is sitting on thousands of pages of documents regarding Epstein—thousands. And of course, you’ve seen the very strong letter.
We will get everything. We will have it in our possession. We will redact it, of course, to protect grand jury information and confidential witnesses, but the American people have a right to know. Donald Trump is the most transparent president in our nation’s history. So not only will America get the full Epstein files, but they will also get the JFK files and the Martin Luther King files.
Bondi issued a demand for the full release of Epstein’s files and has given the FBI a firm deadline of February 28 at 8:00 AM to turn them over.
Levin pressed Bondi on why these documents were hidden for so long, pointing out that SDNY—a hotbed of leftist influence—likely feared what might be exposed.
She also made an announcement that a key FBI official involved in withholding these critical documents “will not be working for us anymore.”
Mark Levin
Well, that’s fantastic. But I assume the Southern District of New York is, or has been, holding on to this information for a reason—that is, they don’t like the names on the list. And of course, we know New York is a hotbed of the Democrat Party, including in legal circles.Do you think that’s part of the issue here—that they’re trying to protect a lot of names and individuals?
Pam Bondi
You know, Mark, I have not reviewed the information yet. As a lawyer, as a prosecutor, I want to review everything before I make a firm conclusion. But I think it’s very interesting that they withheld that from us. I will find out who withheld it, and they will not be working for us anymore.Mark Levin
So once all that’s gathered, you’re just going to put it out in the public with the obvious necessary redactions—protecting the victims and their phone numbers and so forth. But for the perpetrators, I assume we’ll see those names, yes?Pam Bondi
Well, certainly. Nothing can be withheld on that. Of course, as you know, grand jury information and anything confidential will be withheld under the law. We’re going to do everything in our power to protect the victims so they’re not further victimized.
Bondi also hinted that more investigations are coming, including into the corrupt and weaponized Biden DOJ under Jack Smith.
WATCH:
READ FULL ARTICLE
SOURCE: www.thegatewaypundit.com
RELATED: So That’s Why We Haven’t Seen the Real Epstein List
PJ MEDIA | Published March 2, 2025
On his Fox News show “Life, Liberty, and Levin,” Mark Levin had a compelling discussion with Attorney General Pam Bondi about one of the most scandalous yet suspiciously opaque cases in modern history—the Jeffrey Epstein files. Last week, many anticipated bombshell revelations exposing high-profile figures linked to criminal activity on Epstein’s private island. Instead, what we got was a rehash of information already widely known.
So, why is this happening and when are we going to see the new stuff?
Levin wasted no time driving into the matter, noting that his curiosity about the Epstein client lists is mirrored by countless Americans. “I think the American people are very curious about who’s on this list or these lists,” Levin said. “You have been doggedly trying to get all the information and now we learn, thanks to you, that you’ve been stonewalled by people in New York. Do you want to explain that?”
“So, as you know, we released about 120 pages of documents. And I started asking for these documents right when I came into office and before Kash Patel was in there,” she began. “So I ended up getting about 120 pages. We carefully redacted them, of course, to be sure the 254 young girls, women who are victims of sex crimes and sex trafficking, their personal information was redacted and out of there to protect them.”
Her doubts, it turns out, were entirely justified. “So I’m going through it and I kept saying there has to be more, there has to be more,” Bondi said. “I’m assured that’s it. Kash asked the same questions, assured there’s no more. Last I found out, you know, this week that a source told me New York, SDNY, they’re sitting on thousands of pages of documents regarding Epstein. Thousands. Thousands.”
Refusing coy political platitudes, Bondi directly threatened accountability for obstructive bureaucrats: “I will find out who withheld it and they will not be working for us anymore.” Her promise wasn’t mere empty bravado. She laid down the gauntlet: “We will get everything. We will have it in our possession.”
She also assured Levin that the documents would be properly redacted to protect witnesses and grand jury information.
“The American people have a right to know,” she continued. “And Donald Trump is the most transparent president in our nation’s history.”
Levin bluntly suggested a partisan motive behind the Southern District’s suspicious stonewalling. “I assume the Southern District of New York is or has been holding this information for a reason,” he mused sharply, indicating he believes left-wing political interests may be shielding high-profile Democrats potentially implicated by the documents. Levin didn’t mince words about his suspicion, reminding Bondi—and America—that “New York is a hotbed of the Democrat Party—that includes in legal circles.”
Bondi did not dispute Levin’s theory. “As a lawyer, as a prosecutor, I want to review everything before I make a firm conclusion,” Bondi carefully stated, leaving open the possibility of liberal obstructionism. “But I think it’s very interesting that they withheld that from us.”
She also declared that she will find out who withheld the documents and that they will be fired.
Levin asked if the perpetrators’ names would be made public, pressing Bondi for assurance. “Well, certainly there’s nothing can be withheld on that,” she said. “Of course, as you know, grand jury information, anything confidential will be withheld under the law, and we’re going to do everything in our power to protect the victims so they’re not further victimized.”
Be the first to comment