Steve Witkoff Ahead of Round 4 of Talks: Iran Has Agreed ‘They Don’t Want’ Nuclear Weapon

Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian visits Iran’s nuclear achievements exhibition in Tehran, Iran April 9, 2025.
(photo credit: IRAN’S PRESIDENCY/WANA (WEST ASIA NEWS AGENCY)/HANDOUT VIA REUTERS)

| Published May 10, 2025

The United States and Iran are set to resume indirect nuclear negotiations on Sunday, May 11, 2025, in Oman. This fourth round of talks aims to address concerns over Iran’s nuclear program. U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff emphasized that the goal is for Iran to voluntarily shift away from its uranium enrichment activities, which are central to nuclear weapon development. Witkoff stated that if Iran genuinely does not seek nuclear weapons, as it claims, it should dismantle its enrichment facilities and convert its program to purely civilian purposes, similar to the Bushehr nuclear plant .

President Donald Trump has indicated uncertainty about allowing Iran to enrich uranium under a new deal, contrasting with stricter positions from other administration officials who oppose any enrichment capabilities for Iran . The outcome of these talks could significantly impact regional security and international relations, depending on whether a consensus is reached on limiting Iran’s nuclear activities.

The ongoing nuclear talks between the United States and Iran, led by U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff, have several critical implications:

1. U.S.-Iran Relations:

• Potential Diplomatic Breakthrough: If successful, these talks could lead to a new agreement that eases tensions between Washington and Tehran.

• Risk of Collapse: Failure to reach an agreement could further escalate hostilities, including economic sanctions or military threats.

2. Regional Security in the Middle East:

• Reduced Nuclear Threat: A successful agreement could prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, easing security concerns for Israel, Saudi Arabia, and other regional players.

• Risk of Regional Arms Race: If Iran maintains enrichment capabilities, other countries may pursue their own nuclear programs.

3. U.S. Foreign Policy Strategy:

• Diplomatic Credibility: Success in these talks could boost the Trump administration’s reputation for achieving diplomatic solutions.

• Domestic Political Impact: Trump’s mixed signals on allowing Iran to enrich uranium could become a point of criticism from both supporters and opponents.

4. Global Non-Proliferation Efforts:

• Test for International Treaties: The outcome could influence other countries’ willingness to comply with non-proliferation agreements.

• Impact on U.S. Alliances: Allies like Israel may pressure the U.S. for a stricter deal, while European allies may support a more balanced agreement.

5. Economic Consequences:

• Sanctions Relief for Iran: A deal may lead to lifting or easing of sanctions, boosting Iran’s economy.

• Energy Markets: Stability in the region could affect global oil prices, while a breakdown could lead to supply disruptions.

---

Overall Takeaway

The U.S.-Iran nuclear talks led by Steve Witkoff represent a critical diplomatic effort to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, but their success depends on resolving disagreements over uranium enrichment, with significant implications for regional security, global non-proliferation, and U.S. foreign policy credibility.

---

SOURCE: BREITBART – Exclusive — Steve Witkoff Ahead of Round 4 of Talks: Iran Has Agreed ‘They Don’t Want’ Nuclear Weapon

THE JERUSALEM POST – Iran choosing to stop enrichment program is best way to ensure they never get weapons, Witkoff says

THE TIMES OF ISRAEL – Witkoff: Goal of nuclear talks is for Iran to ‘voluntarily’ shift away from enrichment program

---