WOKE SCANDAL IN COLORADO: Democrats attack families, and parents could lose custody for calling their child by their birth name!

This means that if a parent refuses to “affirm” the gender identity their child has chosen, they could lose custody immediately.

The legislation, driven by the radical left, defines the use of the “wrong” name or pronoun as “coercive control” in custody disputes, as detailed in the official text. It also prohibits Colorado courts from cooperating with laws in other states that penalize parents for allowing “gender-affirming” treatments for their children.

Republicans, like Representative Jarvis Caldwell, have denounced this overreach as a direct attack on parental rights, claiming Democrats tried to pass the bill “in the dead of night” to avoid opposition. The law also mandates schools to promote “chosen name” policies and eliminates gender-based dress code rules.

IMPLICATIONS

The implications of Colorado’s HB25-1312, as described in the article, raise serious concerns about parental rights, government overreach, and free speech:

---

🔹 1. Attack on Parental Rights

Conservatives see this bill as a direct assault on the authority of parents to make decisions regarding their own children. Labeling a parent’s refusal to use a child’s preferred gender identity as “coercive control” could criminalize traditional parenting rooted in biological reality and moral or religious convictions.

---

🔹 2. Slippery Slope Toward State Control of Children

There is deep concern that the government is overstepping its role and moving toward state-sanctioned interference in family matters. If a parent risks losing custody simply for using their child’s birth name, it sets a precedent that could expand to other areas where the state disagrees with parental choices.

---

🔹 3. Suppression of Free Speech and Religious Beliefs

Many conservatives argue that being compelled to use certain language, especially when it goes against their beliefs or scientific understanding, violates free speech rights. Religious families may also feel that this law criminalizes their sincerely held beliefs about gender and family.

---

🔹 4. Undermining Biological Truth

The bill’s implications reinforce what some on the right view as the erasure of biological reality in law and culture. Conservatives often stress that recognizing sex-based distinctions is not hateful—it’s factual—and worry about laws that legally mandate ideological compliance.

---

🔹 5. Broader National Trend of Ideological Indoctrination

This legislation is seen as part of a wider “woke” agenda aimed at institutionalizing radical gender ideology in schools, courts, and families. Many fear this will further embolden similar efforts in other states, especially blue-leaning ones.

---

The overall conservative takeaway is that Colorado’s HB25-1312 represents a dangerous overreach of government power into the private lives of families. By potentially punishing parents for affirming their child’s biological sex, the bill is seen as an assault on parental rights, free speech, and traditional values—forcing families to conform to radical gender ideology under threat of legal consequences. Conservatives view it as a clear warning sign of how far the “woke” agenda is willing to go to override biological truth and parental authority.