Epic Troll: Reporter Shows ICE-Storming Dems How They Could Have Had Nice, Calm Tour of Newark Facility

Far-left faith leaders block Delaney Hall ICE facility in Newark / screen image Fox News

| Published May 12, 2025

A recent incident at the Delaney Hall Detention Center in Newark, New Jersey, has intensified the national debate over immigration enforcement and the role of federal agencies in local communities. The arrest of Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, along with several Democratic lawmakers, during a protest at the facility has drawn widespread attention and sparked a series of protests and political reactions.

The Incident at Delaney Hall

On May 9, 2025, Mayor Baraka, accompanied by Representatives Bonnie Watson Coleman, LaMonica McIver, and Robert Menendez Jr., attempted to conduct an oversight visit at the Delaney Hall Detention Center, a private facility operated under contract with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The visit escalated when federal agents arrested Mayor Baraka for trespassing after he allegedly ignored multiple warnings to leave the premises .

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released video footage showing Rep. McIver pushing past ICE agents at the facility’s gate, leading to allegations of assault. DHS officials have indicated that further charges against the lawmakers are being considered .

WATCH:

 

Political and Public Reactions

The arrest has sparked a wave of criticism from Democratic leaders and immigrant advocacy groups. Rep. Watson Coleman condemned the incident as politically motivated, asserting that the actions of the federal agents were an abuse of power . Similarly, Mayor Baraka has vowed to continue his efforts to monitor the facility and advocate for its closure .

In response to the arrest, approximately 50 clergy members from Faith in New Jersey and Faith in Action organized a protest outside the Delaney Hall facility. The group linked arms and sang songs, demanding the closure of the detention center and the cessation of deportation efforts .

WATCH:

Faith leaders created a human chain outside the facility.

Support for the Facility

Conversely, the Trump administration and ICE officials have defended the actions taken at Delaney Hall. DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin emphasized that the facility houses individuals charged with serious offenses, including murder and terrorism, and that the detention center operates within legal parameters . Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons labeled the protest as a “political stunt” and criticized the lawmakers for their actions .

Legal and Ethical Considerations

The incident raises significant questions about the balance between federal authority and local governance. New Jersey’s Attorney General has argued that the reopening of Delaney Hall violates state laws prohibiting agreements between local entities and ICE for immigration detention . The legal status of the facility remains under scrutiny, with ongoing litigation challenging its operations.

---

Pros and Cons of the Incident at Delaney Hall ICE Facility

Pros:

1. Raising Awareness on Immigration Issues:

   • The protest at the Delaney Hall Detention Center has helped draw national attention to the ongoing debate over immigration enforcement, particularly the treatment of individuals in ICE detention facilities.

   • For lawmakers and advocacy groups, this visibility presents an opportunity to highlight perceived injustices, pushing for changes in immigration policies and the closure of facilities they view as inhumane.

2. Demonstrating Local Political Resistance:

   • The protest shows a strong, localized effort against federal immigration policies, with officials like Mayor Baraka and the protesting lawmakers emphasizing their commitment to representing their communities’ interests over federal mandates.

   • The action highlights the dynamic between local and federal authorities, showcasing how local politicians are pushing back against what they consider harmful policies.

3. Mobilizing Public Opinion and Support:

   • The arrest of lawmakers and the subsequent protests could rally more public support for the closure of the facility and immigration reform, particularly among immigrant advocacy groups, faith-based organizations, and progressives who align with these positions.

4. Legal and Ethical Examination of Detention Facilities:

   • The incident raises significant legal and ethical questions about the operations of ICE detention centers, which may prompt deeper investigations and discussions on the legality and morality of detaining individuals, particularly in private, profit-driven facilities.

---

Cons:

1. Potential for Escalating Political Polarization:

   • The incident is likely to exacerbate political polarization, further entrenching division between conservative and liberal factions on immigration issues. Supporters of ICE and Trump may see the protest as an illegal and disruptive stunt, while opponents may view it as a necessary action against unjust practices.

   • The conflict could deepen animosity, with little middle ground found for a constructive dialogue on immigration reform.

2. Criticism of Disruptive Political Actions:

   • The protest and arrest could be viewed as an unnecessary disruption, especially if it appears to be politically motivated rather than focused on legal or humanitarian concerns.

   • Some may argue that the actions of the lawmakers jeopardize public safety and contribute to undermining respect for law enforcement and authority.

3. Legal and Political Ramifications for the Protestors:

   • With federal charges being considered, the protesting lawmakers and local officials could face legal consequences, which could tarnish their political careers and potentially diminish their public support.

   • The incident might provoke further legal battles, dividing public opinion even more as both sides argue over the appropriateness of their actions.

4. Strengthening Proponents of ICE and Detention Facilities:

   • The protest could ultimately strengthen the resolve of those who support ICE and believe that the facilities play a vital role in national security and enforcing immigration laws.

   • The backlash from this protest could make it more difficult for lawmakers to push through meaningful reforms, especially in conservative areas where there is strong support for strict immigration policies.

---

Conclusion

The confrontation at Delaney Hall has underscored the deep divisions in the United States regarding immigration policy and the role of federal agencies in enforcing these policies. As the situation develops, it is clear that the debate over immigration enforcement will continue to be a focal point in American politics, with significant implications for the relationship between federal and local governments, as well as the rights of individuals within immigrant communities.

---

SOURCES – REDSTATE – Epic Troll: Reporter Shows ICE-Storming Dems How They Could Have Had Nice, Calm Tour of Newark Facility

THE GATEWAY PUNDIT – “Shut Down This Facility!” – Far-Left ‘Faith Leaders’ Block Gates at Newark ICE Detention Center, Say They Won’t Move Until They Are Arrested (VIDEO)

---