Exclusive: Dead voters, no ID checks – this document reveals gross errors in the federal election

Marcel Luthe

| Published April 24, 2025

Marcel Luthe is challenging the federal election results – his points of criticism are numerous. The Berliner Zeitung has obtained the complaint exclusively.

The Berliner Zeitung article titled “Exclusive: Dead Voters, No ID Checks – Will This Overturn the Result of the Federal Election?” addresses potential weaknesses in the German electoral system, particularly with regard to the federal election. It highlights two main points: the possibility that votes from deceased people could be counted and the lack of general ID checks at polling stations.

Voices of the deceased
In Germany, it is legally stipulated that the vote of a voter who dies before or on election day remains valid, provided they previously voted by mail. This is stipulated in Section 39, Paragraph 5 of the Federal Election Act. However, cases have come to light in which voting notifications were sent to deceased individuals. This indicates possible deficiencies in the updating of voter registers. If someone fraudulently applies for and uses a ballot for a deceased person, this constitutes a criminal offense.

No general ID checks

In federal elections, it is not mandatory to present an identity card or passport at the polling station. Presenting the voter’s notification is usually sufficient. Only if there is doubt about the voter’s identity or the notification is missing can the electoral board request proof of identity. This regulation is based on trust in the integrity of voters and the deterrent effect of criminal penalties in the event of electoral fraud.

Assessment of risks

Although the issues mentioned could theoretically provide opportunities for electoral fraud, there is currently no reliable evidence that such vulnerabilities have been exploited to a degree that would have significantly influenced the election outcome. However, the discussion on these issues underscores the need to review existing processes and, where appropriate, improve them to strengthen confidence in the integrity of the electoral system.

Overall, the Berliner Zeitung article highlights that there are areas in the German electoral system that could potentially be vulnerable to abuse. However, it is important to emphasize that there is currently no concrete evidence of systematic electoral fraud. Nevertheless, the issues raised could provide grounds for a review and possible reforms of electoral procedures to ensure the security and transparency of future elections.

Here are the key implications from the Berliner Zeitung article about possible election vulnerabilities in Germany:

🇩🇪 1. Trust in the Electoral Process May Erode

• The revelation that votes from deceased individuals may be counted and that ID checks aren’t mandatory can undermine public confidence in the fairness and transparency of elections.

• Even if no large-scale fraud occurred, perception alone can damage trust in democratic institutions.

🧾 2. Pressure for Electoral Reform Could Grow

• The lack of ID checks and outdated voter rolls may trigger public and political demands for reform, such as:

  • Mandatory ID verification at polling stations.

  • More frequent updates to voter databases.

  • Digital tracking or biometric verification systems.

⚖️ 3. Legal and Constitutional Challenges

• If irregularities are proven to have influenced results in tight races, legal contests could emerge, challenging the legitimacy of the outcome.

• This could lead to parliamentary inquiries, lawsuits, or calls for recounts or even re-elections in specific districts.

🧑‍⚖️ 4. Increased Scrutiny from Opposition Parties

• Political groups that suspect manipulation or negligence might use the situation to criticize ruling parties or election officials.

• This could further polarize political discourse and be used as campaign material in future elections.

🌍 5. International Reputation at Stake

• Germany, as a leading democratic nation, could face global scrutiny if its elections are seen as vulnerable.

• This might affect how other countries view Germany’s ability to promote democratic norms abroad.

👥 6. Risk of Exploitation by Malicious Actors

• Knowledge of these system weaknesses could embolden bad-faith actors, both domestic and foreign, to attempt to exploit the system in the future.

• Disinformation campaigns could amplify even minor issues to cause greater public unrest.

SOURCES: BERLINER ZEITUNG – Exclusive: Dead voters, no ID checks – this document reveals gross errors in the federal election

THE GATEWAY PUNDIT – Explosive Report Alleges Election Sabotage in Germany: Dead Voters, Missing Ballots, and No ID Checks