| Published May 28, 2025
Undercover video catches DNC vice chairman dishing about man who ‘had an enormous amount of power’
Project Veritas released an undercover video featuring conversations with David Hogg, Vice Chair of the Democratic National Committee, and Deterrian Jones, a former staffer in the Biden White House Office of Digital Strategy.
In the footage, Hogg discusses the role of Anthony Bernal, Chief of Staff to First Lady Jill Biden. Hogg is recorded describing Bernal as someone who held “an enormous amount of power,” noting his influence within the administration. He comments on Bernal’s status among White House staff, suggesting that Bernal had proximity to high-level decision-making.
Deterrian Jones also appears in the video, sharing his experiences and impressions of Bernal during his time in the Office of Digital Strategy. Jones describes Bernal as a significant figure within the administration, referring to him as a “wizard of oz-type figure.” He characterizes Bernal’s influence as something that staff were aware of, describing it as an “open secret.”
Both individuals spoke informally and off-the-record in what appears to be casual, social settings. The video presents candid commentary on personalities and internal culture within the Biden White House, focusing particularly on the role and perception of Jill Biden’s Chief of Staff.
WATCH:
BREAKING: Undercover Meeting with DNC Leader @davidhogg111 Reveals who REALLY ran the Biden White House
“He wielded an enormous amount of power… I can’t stress to you enough how much power he had at the White House.”
“It was an open secret… I would avoid him, he was… pic.twitter.com/i7fskTwhNw
— Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) May 28, 2025
Here are some potential implications based on the content of the undercover video, while staying grounded in the statements made:
1. Influence of Unelected Staff:
If Anthony Bernal, Jill Biden’s Chief of Staff, holds significant sway over policy discussions or personnel decisions—as suggested by Hogg and Jones—it could raise questions about the influence of unelected advisors in the White House. Such figures often operate behind the scenes, but their reach into executive decision-making may prompt public scrutiny or internal debate.
2. Power Dynamics in the Biden Administration:
The references to Bernal as a “wizard of oz-type figure” and someone with “enormous power” may suggest that some staffers see key influence coming from individuals outside the traditional chain of command. This could indicate a less centralized leadership model, or internal tensions around who truly drives policy and messaging.
3. Potential Political Fallout:
Given Hogg’s role as DNC Vice Chair and Jones’ White House experience, their candid comments might be used by political opponents to frame the administration as lacking transparency or being controlled by a small inner circle. The timing and publicization of these remarks could have strategic impacts during an election cycle or major legislative push.
4. Internal Morale and Staff Culture:
Jones’s decision to “stay away” from Bernal due to his perceived authority might reflect broader staff discomfort or unease within the White House team. If such sentiments are widespread, it could suggest a top-heavy or insular environment where certain advisors dominate the internal hierarchy.
Overall Takeaway: